As a father and primary bread winner, I work ~60 miles away from where I live. For over a year now, I've been commuting 120 miles round tripp daily. The employment is what allows me to pay my mortgage and homeowners association fees on time.
Due to the stress from the monster commute, my employer had actually requested that I relocate closer to work.
In the midst of the real estate market slowdown, I've tried unsuccessfully to sell my condo. As a result, I've rented a house close to my work and resorted to rent out my condo.
The catch is, the HOA has within its terms (CC&R's) a requirement that it maintains an 80% owner occupancy ratio. Because the owner occupancy ratio is well short of 80% today, the HOA is prohibiting me from renting out my condo.
Needless to say, the financial burden of paying rent on a house and mortgage on another is taken a toll on my wife and myself. The HOA terms specify that exceptions - to the 80% owner occupancy requirement - can be made for reasons of "hardship" due to employer-instigated physical relocation.
Is the HOA requirement legally enforceable in a court of law? How can I challenge this, so as to stave off financial problems down the road?
Tags: