How hot do you think the fire in the twin towers was?

Question

no offense to anyone

Answer 1

It was hot enough to kill a muthaf#cka!

Answer 2

Does it matter?  

You probably ask the question to determine if it was hot enough to melt steel.  Correct?

If you research it, you will find scientists on both sides claiming different things.  You must decide who you believe is more credible based on their "science" and their potential gain and political alliances.  Science is like beauty.  It is in the eye of the beholder.  Go to a court room sometime and watch the two sides give scientific evidence.  Each side's "expert" presents a different science.   The jury decides which is more credible not only based on the science, but based on the credibility of the party who commissioned the science.  In the case of 9/11, the jury is 300 million people.

There is plenty of evidence for government foreknowledge that I can say with certainty that I believe the government and media are lying about 9/11.  I do find the alternate explanations for the collapse of the buildings to be more credible than the government's explanations, but in the end it doesn't matter.  The government is lying, and I can hold that opinion without subscribing to any of the alternate theories.

Alternate theories often take attention away from the underlying issue.  The important issue is the government is lying.  We need a proper and thorough investigation into all aspects of 9/11.  This time, all evidence must be factored in, not just evidence that the Bush implant, Director Zelikow, decided to allow into the investigation.

Answer 3

it was 800 degrees Celsius