... yet wrong to use the term ignorant to describe who believes that demonic possession is the "only" explanation they can think of for what is likely mental illness?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AqQQtxyfYWbWrbqjt.Wds2fsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20080801224517AAkGyc5
My answer to this question got deleted by Yahoo after, presumably, the asker reported me for calling him ignorant.
The gist of my answer was this:
-If that was the "only" explanation the asker could come up with, they were ignorant of psychology and psychiatry.
-Dismissing mental illness as demonic possession is an insult to the millions who suffer from it around the world.
-The asker has no knowledge of the case at all and is in no way in a position to make any diagnosis.
-No reputable psychiatrist or psychologist would even suggest "demons" were behind it.
Ignorance is defined as the condition of being uneducated, unaware, or uninformed. Clearly this applies and the asker's use of the word "only" is evidence enough.
Yahoo! has refused to explain how my answer was contrary to the community guidelines and also has refused to address my complaint that the question was in violation of the guidelines for being insulting to the millions with mental illness (hate speech) and proselytizing while barely asking a question AND calling me a jerk, an unsubstantiated claim.
I'm not one for censorship as I believe ignorant and foolish opinions are best expressed publicly so they can be exposed for their ignorance and foolishness. But if Yahoo! is going to delete the counterpoint, doesn't that amount to condoning the ignorance and bigotry?
This site is for Q&A, not a soapbox for promoting theology.
If you agree, please report the above question for hate speech and insulting the millions suffering from mental illness around the world.
Tags: