How was 9/11 an inside job?

Question

like some say there were bombs in the building- but then if there were bombs in the building- why did the planes hit the building- why didnt the building just explode without the planes hitting it-

it does seem like the buildings fell fast-

Answer 1

it is not an inside job.  Those buildings were key sources to our economy and our dollar.  and the terrorists admitted they did it and took full responsibility.

Answer 2

The planes were necessary for a distraction and to attempt to make the story believable.

They were also necessary for the mass brainwash. Imagery is a powerful brainwashing tool.  By striking the towers with the planes and allowing the towers to stand for a time before detonating, they ensured the eyes of America were fixed on the towers as they fell. Without that imagery, the criminals would not have succeeded in brainwashing the people to accept the phony war on terror and all that It spawned. Hitler would have been impressed.

Only the criminals know how they did it, and I'm not talking about the Arabs. I hate to speculate about how it was done. I would rather see a new and impartial investigation evaluate ALL of the evidence. We'll see what and who shakes out as a result of that investigation. It will happen.

Answer 3

and lets not forget about Al Queda, taking full responsibility for it.

Answer 4

of course it was an inside job just like pearl harbor Roosevelt's administration hired some j*p-Americans  to attack pearl so that America  could enter the war

you conspiracy theorists are a bunch of dodos you guys think everything that happens in America is a conspiracy from JFK assassination to Clinton's oral bl*wjob there is no conspiracy  Lee Harvey Oswald was alone and he killed JFK Clinton did get a bl*wjob in the oval by Monica Lewinsky and terrorists hijacked the plane and flew them into the twin towers which collapsed as a result

Answer 5

The two towers were hit by planes and collapsed into their own footprint after an hour or so. The flames were so intense that they softened steel to make it buckle. But from this debris, the passport of one of the hijackers was found by the investigating agencies. Imagine the scene of a terrorist having his passport in his pocket, hitting the tower, engulf the same in the initial ball of flame, flame spreading all over, the building collapsing and then from that debris one passport surfacing intact !

Whenever there is a terrorist action, immediately the police would launch a case and the Govt. would support investigation. But in this case till now there has been no police case and investigation. Within hours, the Govt. came out with the list of hijackers (half of them alive even now) and then announced a war. Two days before 9/11, Bush approved war on Afghanistan. It took 444 days for the Govt. to incorporate a commission of inquiry with members from Democratic Party as well as Republican Party, the equal partners in the crime who blamed it on somebody thousands of miles away in caves. How did OBL manage to neutralise the great military might of USA ? No answer. How did OBL manage all the put options on Airline stocks ? No answer. Why did they dismantle the crime scene without investigation ? No answer. Why is it that the Israeli connection being treated as 'classified' ? No answer.

Regarding building 7: The amount of advance knowledge about it is surprising. How can NIST answer this aspect ? And why did NIST take such a long time to make a report ? Why was it that very little amount was allocated for this investigation ? No answer.

Regarding Pentagon attack: The plane evaporated ! All but one of 85 videos vanished !

Regarding the Pennsylvania plane: The wife of one of the passengers gave a call from her cell phone and the airlines clarifies later that they did not have that technology in 2001 ! Donald Rumsfeld said later casually that the plane was shot down by a misslie.

Why did US Centcom engage the services of 10,000 bloggers to debunk the 'conspiracy' theories ?

I challenge the US Govt. to prove its innocence. I challenge them to independently investgate this crime by eminent impartial policemen of repute. And why does George Bush need 100,000 acres of land in Paraguay which has no extradition treaty with USA ?

Answer 6

The terrorists did fly the planes into the buildings. That is a fact that nobody disputes. What is disputed is whether or not the federal government knew of the plan in advance and whether or not the buildings could have collapsed the way they did just from the damage the planes caused. That is what some feel may have been the "inside job".

Answer 7

Yeah, how else could we take control of the middle east and erase personal freedom? duh.

Answer 8

It was not a inside job but it would take the power of a corporation to fund it and pull it off. A government has too much oversight from we the people.

Answer 9

It wasn't. They didn't fall fast. They were burning for an hour and a half at temperatures in the area of 1500 to 1800 degrees, generated by the burning jet fuel and material in the building. After that amount of time, the metal beams supporting the tons and tons of concrete above the impact area softened from the heat. They didn't melt. They softened and lost tensile strength and the ability to support the loads. Once they lost the ability to support the building above the impact area, the floors dropped and pancaked upon one another, collapsing in upon itself.

Of course, there is always a faction of society that believes everyting that happens ina conspiracy. They are not familiar with  the concept of Ockham's Razor and always add extranious, unsubstanciated factors the equation. They like to wear tin foils hats too, to protect their brains from alien mind control waves.

Answer 10

They needed an excuse for the demolition. Something to make it look plausible. They failed in that of course.

Answer 11

It's to confusing!

I've mixed thoughts about this

and turned 'skeptic' when Gov. couldn't even convince people about simple Que.'s!

Ive seen many documentaries that makes you think hard! and Que. even harder!!

These films describe and demonstrate the acts of demolition and how fire couldn't caused the fall of the towers which in many other occasions, fire even burning for hours and hours did not ''pancake'' the buildings!?

Pretty convincing!

But the main thing/mystery

that raise the eyebrow even higher,

is the whole scenario or big picture of: 9/11+bush+Iraq+cheney/Halliburton+Privet contractors+.....!!?

Answer 12

Because you can't demolish a building in a controlled demolition fashion by wishing it away, or by crashing planes into them. The WTC engineers admitted they were designed to handle several crashes from jetliners.

Explosives had to be planted. Google search "9/11 solutions" for more clues and evidence.

Answer 13

It would have been amazing that all 3 planes managed to hit EXACTLY where the bombs supposedly were in the buildings.  How could they have targeted so precisely?  It would be very likely that there would have been secondary explosions in different places.  There weren't.  The cause was the burning jet fuel (the planes were nearly full) that weakened the support structure after a fire.  If explosives had been there the spread of debris from the initial impact would have been much larger and the towers would have fallen almost immediately.  The fire was obviously just a large ball of flame from the fuel.  An explosive, even low grade explosive, is much more violent than what was observed in the towers.

Answer 14

Because the people who did it were inside the air plane hence inside job LOL

Answer 15

if the buildings really fell as a result of the steel melting due to fire like the governement says then the building wouldnt have fallen symetrically at free fall speed (a plane didnt even hit building 7.)  there had to be explosives planted inside the building there is overwhelming evidence to support this.  it was a controlled demolition, its the truth whether you accept or reject it