Hurricane Gustav vs Hurricane Katrina?

Question

which one was more destructive?

Answer 1

Gustav may be, yet - but not weatherwise.

I'm referring to all the "refugees" who are whining, bitching and complaining about whatever facilities they went to.  Seems none of it was good enough for them.

So it wasn't as bad as Katrina and everybody should have known that beforehand.  Here, we took in 3000 of them and gave them free stuff the locals could never affford.

Do they say thanks??  h**l, no!  They want a free ride home right this minute!

I wish I could send them all right this minute - and they will not be welcome back again!

Answer 2

Certainly Katrina it was a category 4 at one time when it hit land.Gustav is a bad one also but Katrina I believe is the worse since Andrew which devistated the intire nation with the cost of 4 billion dollarsin damages.All have certainly left their mark in United States history of storms.

Answer 3

Katrina was more destructive due to the ineptness of local government in New Orleans and Louisiana. New Orleans government neglected the levees and the pumps so they would not function during a bad storm. Mayor Noggin and others spent the levee money on foolishness and the result was severe damage and death. They all should have been removed from office for dereliction of duty. Instead, the liberals blamed Bush and re-elected the idiot responsible. Thanks to the efforts of millions of American tax payers and the Bush administration, the levees and pumps have been repaired. And they functioned this time.

Answer 4

george w. bush..

Answer 5

Since Katrina was a chick, I'd say Katrina.