Question:

I'm taking a poll, Do you think Nuclear power should be the primary source of energy? yes or no?

by Guest59138  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

if no why?

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

17 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. YES


  2. It is cheaper, cleaner, and far more effective than fossil fuels.  France is almost exclusively nuclear powered and they have had no problems with it.

    Naturally, security needs to be ratcheted up, but that is something we need more of anyway.

  3. Yes, sure.  Cause she said so.

  4. no

  5. No.  Chernobyl and Three Mile Island.  'Nuf said.

  6. No! Just to build the power plant is energetically inadequate, to keep the used uranium material for thousands of years in a safe way is energetically consuming and has not been fully tested (and no one wants to have such a site next door) and there are other ways to harness/generate energy. Sustainable living is possible, with all the technology and know-how available today the only objections we have is insufficient government backing. Free solar packs for everyone do not sound good to ears of massive energy producers... Not mentioning that double glazing should be requested by law... Away with silly conservation area building regulations!

  7. no absolutely not

    its too dangerous to our planet

    i support wind and sun and water power

    here in massachusetts usa

  8. No, b'cos it create environment problem which ultimately affects human health especially small children. It also produce many harmful gases which can lead to dead and many disease which can't be cure.

  9. Absolutely no. Wat if it explode? B environmental friendly man. Make use of it wisely. dun destroy the world ur livng in.

  10. in france it is.

    in usa, it should be.

  11. No, wind and solar energy are cheaper and better for our environment than nuclear energy.

  12. No, still using depletable resources. Also creates hazardous waste.

  13. no

    it's too costly, the waste is difficult to get rid of and dangerous. There are cleaner ways (environmentally, not as in the air because the only gas given off is hydrogen and water vapour) and they aren't the prettyest things in the world now are they

  14. I think it should one of the major sources but there needs to be a public debate about safety particularly the issue of potential terrorist activity

  15. Yes, it should be in all countries.

  16. no  ....we have already proven the use of solar energy with solar panels and some people run their entire homes from them...so instead of use using nuclear power or always being plugged into a power plant...lets take those sub stations and all the towers span out across our country and put solar panels on them...but all the bushies wont let you...imagine if we found alternates to coal ,,oil ,,gasolines..we would cripple the rich..so do you think they would let that happen...get real

  17. yes it should

    p.s. good question !
You're reading: I'm taking a poll, Do you think Nuclear power should be the primary source of energy? yes or no?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 17 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now