Question:

I am learning more about usa history and i find this today ?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Many of the American field commanders who participated in the invasion of Mexico supported total annexation. Brigadier General William J. Worth, a rabid expansionist and racist, was quite explicit:

That our race is finally destined to overrun the whole continent is too obvious to need proof.... After much reflection I have arrived at the conclusion that it is our decided policy to hold the whole of Mexico -- The details of occupation are comparatively unimportant -- I mean by occupation, permanent conquest and future annexation....

However, internal contradictions in the United States stymied the movement for the annexation of all Mexico.

The U.S. War on Mexico proved to be devastating enough without total annexation. The thirty-five year campaign against Spain and Mexico brought to a climax in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo guaranteed slavery in Texas and expanded the United States from the Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico to the Pacific Ocean. Americans like to dress up the land-grab and call it "Manifest Destiny", but history shows it for what it really was -- naked aggression by a superior power that robbed the Mexican people of their birthright in North America and crippled the future of their young republic.

The struggle for the ownership of the land in the stolen territories did not end with the conclusion of the war. Although the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo recognized the legitimacy of Spanish and Mexican land grants and offered the Mexican inhabitants in the ceded territories American citizenship, the influx of land-hungry and ruthless whites resulted in widespread oppression that sparked mass exile and repatriation. The exile of Mexican citizens from Texas that began after the Anglo takeover of 1836 intensified after the war in 1848. Besieged refugees abandoned their farms and ranches and moved across the Rio Grande to the old Mexican towns of Paso del Norte, Guerrero, Mier, Camargo, Reynosa, and Matamoros and established the new towns of Nuevo Laredo, Mesilla, and Guadalupe.

the mexican had legal land and it was stolen too, correct?

http://www.houstonculture.org/hispanic/conquest4.html

 Tags:

   Report

3 ANSWERS


  1. is this a question or a history lesson lol

    well ill just comment on this anyways

    yes manifest destiny = basically lets push westward and take out anything in the way whether it be natives mexicans or british.

    but then you have to kind of look at both sides, mexico played into the united states hands perfectly

    they thought they had what it took to take on the american eagle, so they took up the challenge issued forth by the americans and clashed in what is today known as the mexican-american war...

    haha they got their asses kicked pretty hard though

    but then again this all ultimately lead to our own civil war which was very bloody and violent moreso than the mexican one

    so i guess in a way we both got fcked.

    mexico did get the shorter end though heehee.


  2. Thanks for sharing.

  3. History is just THAT. . ... HISTORY...!!!!!  What happened in the past happened in so many places in the world throughout history... it happened in Europe, it happened in Spain,  it happened in England,  it happened in Israel and Palestine and Turkey and Poland and Italy... and EVERYWHERE....  there were wars and there were good AND bad people in this world in every single walk of life in every piece of land on earth....what was to BECOME the USA was a new territory.... people came in in droves to explore and claim pieces of it for whichever country they were from.... in all actually, the USA was "stolen from the Indians" when it comes right down to it... so your point here is what?   Mexico was at war, the US was at war, Spain was at war... ownership of land shifted all over the place... not just MEXICO and NOT just because of white "Americans"....  don't go blaming the present day "Anglo" population for the problems in Mexico... Mexicans created their own problems... that's why millions of them are SNEAKING into the USA to live because they can't stand it it their own country....   Those who come here legally are most welcome.. those who want to live here and work here and thrive here are welcome... those who just want to live here off the benefits without working hard and trying to come into the country ILLEGALLY should be sent back to Mexico or any other country they might "sneak" in here from...  If the tables were turned, would Mexico welcome poor non working American's flooding into THEIR country so THEY could be supported by the Mexican people?  I doubt it.    

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 3 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions