I did not see the match but what is it that blake was griping about gonzales during the olympic match? ?

Question

was blake justified with his complaint? what happen to the Hawkeye when you needed it in times like this?

Answer 1

jsm's rite but the ump didnt over rule hawk eye because there was no challenge and unfortunately it is against the rules for blake to challenge sumthing like that even though he was rite as tv replays showed (which the ump did not see) poor sportsmanship by gonzo and im happy he lost to nadal but blake lost to djoko and cudn't get a medal..bad luck follows this poor guy everywhere

Answer 2

He was complaining about this:

After a heated rally on a critical point, Gonzales comes up to the net while Blake backhands a really nice passing shot. The ball, however, went long.... BUT Blake claims that the ball nicked Gonzales' racket first before it went out. I really think that Blake was justified in his complaint. The hawk-eye, actually revealed that Gonzalez's racket had touched the ball! Blake was mad that 1) The chair umpire overruled the hawk-eye and gave Gonzales the point, and 2) that Gonzales looked him straight in the eye and didn't call his own mistake. He is DEFINITELY justified in his complaint. =)  

Answer 3

gonzo cheated.-

in one point, blake hit a ball that was going long, and the umpire called that way, but what the umpire didn't see was that before the ball bounced, it hit gonzalez's racquet.-

blake complaint about to the umpire, and when he asked gonzalez what happened, he told the ball didn't touch his racquet.- it was shown on tv that the ball DID hit gonzalez racquet.-

so, blake was pissed not because he lost, cause he didn't lose for that point, but for the lack of sportsmanship of gonzalez.-