I have been summarily shot by conserfatives. In recovering enough to know the hows and whys, I met a pro-conserfative "self declared loyal soldier", a fellow patient and continuous antagonist.
This fellow's picture was replacing mine when I last reviewed my medical history. And vertually none of the medical history was accurate, for MY CASE.
Given this is true, and given "the state" went "after" guardianship, is it possible, or even likely, that a State official gifted my name to this "more loyal citizen of the DHHS's country of service, Homeland"?
No, I was not informed of any change to my status. But I was shown a chart with another person's picture in it, but my name. And though the hospital did remove the picture (the staff knew me and would not deneigh me to my face ~ but they did not take a new picture either...)
But does a citizen in cases of "extraordinary rendition" get told that he is considered to be an alien now?
Does the DHHS get the "right" to ask for a guardianship, then a change of name "to protect the innocent"? But merely forget to tell half of the parties so "changed"?
In effect I'm owed : a pension from the Marines, the Bangor Town Police ~ twice, and the NYPD and the Maine Game Wardens service, or as they like to call themselves, the DIFW (I always refused to call myself Deputy DIFW).
Being a Liberal, I cannot expect payment of these debts. But any lackadaisy bribe taking conserfative fellow might expect the same sort of treatment the conserfative "men" ~ as Obama calls conserfatives ~ get treated. Persons like say Freeway Ricky Ross, who got less than 2.5 years for selling more Cocaine than any person in history...a Liberal de@dbeat dad gets more than the record holder cocaine seller...doesn't it become obvious...conserfatives are pro lawlessness?
Thus, as the conserfatives shot me in each service save the Marines (they smuthered me then went hand to hand with me in the parking lot in front of the barracks whilst I was recovering from 13 bullet wounds...), I feel I was really not "used well". Each service should have offered me continued medical care, at the very least. Each attack was service related, and I was never in the wrong.
But, I'm "not politico".
I'm Liberal.
And Anti-Drug Dealing Contra, who "caught" (was led into an ambush by) high level US governmental and State governmental and Private Enterprise individuals and shot to make example of (but unlike my brother and the judge, didn't die...quite).
So, is it likely I'm victim of "legal" redistribution of my right to self, or persona? While the other, "more loyal", but deliberately less effective, soldier, is rewarded for wounds he never received, he having avoided combat perhaps by taking the bribe?
Conserfatives value case law. It after all allows them to steal things. Case Law includes precident for a King changing a name. Dukes could loose "title" or gain it at the Kings whim. Judges are our form of whimsey if you will...the conserfatives apparently think.
Part two of the question: If one suspects, or rather has been shown evidence of one's ID being altered is one liable in any way for keeping to one's own Christian name despite the fact that the court seems to have altered one's name through a dishonest gardianship?
How might one's hospital record be so substancially altered otherwise?
I have a bad reaction to sulfer ~ for instance, corresponding to an implant of artificial cartillage in the early 1980s after being run over by a car load of sorrority pledges on a dare to jump a hill in Brewer. They hit me, I lost the cartillage in my left foot's heel. I've had bad reactions within the last few years but because I cannot consistantly recall this need to avoid sulfer due to head injuries from bullet wounds to hammer blows. But I owned a gerbil who got red eye allot and consequently gave it to me and the treatment of first choice here is Sulfer meds. given something keeps the doctors from recording my contraindications. I live in a sort of supported care facillity with 24 / 7 staffing.
What, other than "legal manuevering" would permit a facility such as this to "forget" a former cop might not need to have that internal prosthetic tourturously swollen by reaction to sulfer, tearing all his tendons and ligaments and releasing poisons into his system? (Two of the Staff members are in fact from that sorority).
By gardianship being "granted" to a less than honest person, by a less than honest judge, for the purposes perhaps of making ridicule of one's service record, by "gaining the right" to state : "No that fellow never did any of that !" Conserfatives are giving themselves the right to sell d ope more effectively, by ridiculing the police.
Contras were selling d ope in Maine, I caught them, then got shot 13 times, and cannot be expected to give reliable testimony (and even if I could, have reason to believe that Ron Reagan authorized the SALE UNDER WAR POWERS ~ and the
Tags: