I have some basketball confusions here, someone PLEASE HELP ME?

Question

Someone named "Granny Curser" once said, LeChoke got swept for a team that the Lakers them 4-1, so:

Lakers>Spurs>>>>>>>>>Cavs

This is the part that I get confused at:

It took Celtics (or Celtdicks) 7 games to beat Hawks and the Cavs (last minute victory), and they only beat Pistons (or PISStons) by 8 game 6, and the Lakers lost a lot (like 30 or somthing) at game 6. So what's the formula here?

Answer 1

There is no formula, the better team wins, celtics excuted plays, they played good defence and they shot the ball well. Lakers are a good team and could have won the chamionship if they played like a team.

Answer 2

hes a kobe lover, they make no sense at all times. there is no formula there, that makes no sense, if you go by that formula you will also get that the hawks were better than the lakers.

that formula also states that at least 4 teams in the east were better than every team in the west.

Answer 3

laker fans have no logic they just like to talk it gets me confused sometimes too

Answer 4

HERE'S THE FORMULA

LAKERS>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ALL OTHER TEAMS