I just like to clarify, that i wasnt meaning Nalbandian is better than Federer overall....Nina haha ?

Question

Ofcourse David isnt, Roger Federer is number 1 in the world for a reason his past results prove this. However i do feel David played a much better match today than the Fedster, so Nina you can come down off your high horse, always trying to defend Roger its soooo annoying you use any exscuse if Federer loses ``sun was in his eyes`` blah blah haha All im saying is if David hadnt made sooo many unforced errors then we would be seeing a different line up in the semis:) He was dictating most of the points throughout that match, Roger was just lucky to have Nalbandian make those errors!

Answer 1

It is tough not to admire Federer. He is the most talented player and has a great mind to go with his game. There is no one in any individual sport in this era, who has a more consistent record.

Other players are bound to have their days against him, but it wont be many. He is the greatest sportsman of this era.

Answer 2

I agree with you. Nalby is someone who thrives on playing Fed. He gives the impression he's more comfy playing Fed than say a 100th ranked player...may be just due to the style of Fed's play. And while I wasn't watching the match, the statistics give me the impression that Nalby played extremely poorly in the 2nd and 3rd sets :(

thanks for clarifying that he made a lot of unforced errors.

Answer 3

Nalby is great, he will be #1.

Answer 4

I know what you mean, Nalbandian has a good mental edge over Federer but maybe not after his come-back win today.