Am wondering if key people's work was "accessible".
If projects are anything like as in "Dilbert" am wondering how "accessible" work would be produced. (too many points of accidental, or intentional , sabotage).
I see listed <<Bob Clark, Operational Software Manager, SWSC, project and DMO>>
Am wondering if his work would have been accessible. It would seem possible for work produced at SWSC to be reused at "project" and at "DMO", thus guaranteeing project success.
Murphy's law seems to guarantee that all his work would have been fouled up, nullifying any reusability of it.
(Exception might be if you had squads of sailors armed with submachine guns standing guard, ensuring nothing was fouled up).
Tags: