My kid's elementary school PTA membership fee is $25 per parent. PTA board members are a bunch of self-important windbags. They only have 1 meeting in the whole school year for all members, the rest are elected board members only. Any new parent who tries to run for a PTA position is adroitly discouraged and outmaneuvered.
I volunteer a lot at school, but stay away from PTA & PTA conducted events. I'm fairly wellknown in the school, and this year lot of parents have come to know that I don't join the PTA, and instead contribute $ to my kid's classroom & grade directly. And, lot of parents have chosen to do the same - instead of paying to join the PTA, they are directing that and more $ to their child's classroom.
Because of its bad reputation, only about 15% of parents join the PTA, the rest think "why join and have our $ distributed over the whole school, I would rather have it help the 20 kids in my child's classroom only".
The PTA president approached me directly and requested me to join the PTA, so more parents join. I politely refused.
To put it in perspective, ours is a very affluent area. Rich to very rich parents, and it can be safely said that almost all can afford the membership fee, but just don't. It rankles me to be one of the few to pay $25 or $50 to the PTA, and have it spread over the whole school while 85% of parents chose not to pay and join.
Does it make me a less invovled parent if I choose to focus on my kid's classroom and not the whole school? Are most school's PTAs like this, with low membership?
Tags: