I read that two US scientists explained the Bible's 10 plagues, and how they could be natural occurrences...

Question

Does anyone have a link for this?

Answer 1

I think you're looking for this:

http://www.vision.org/visionmedia/articl...

Personally, I would first need to know that the plagues occurred in the first place before I would start looking for scientific explanations for them. But if you're a believer in the Jewish, Muslim or Christian faith, this may be of interest to you.

Answer 2

It was on TV.  History or Discovery channel.

Oh and the gods live on Mt Olympus and dragons are real too!

Answer 3

No

If you read it, don't you

Try googling it

Answer 4

Those were possibly terrible plagues, but the plague of gnats that devastated the Yankees last night in Cleveland is the worst I remember (and this time we have indisputable evidence)!

Answer 5

searching ,i found this;

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/4173...

and this is a virologists book selection;

http://www.allbookstores.com/Virologists...

Answer 6

What a crock.  Read Exodus for yourself and tell me if YOU think the people of that time couldn't tell the difference between blood and algae.  Not to mention the frogs, the gnats, the flies, the locusts, the hail, the deaths of the first born sons and ONLY the first born sons.  How is it conceivable that these horrors took place in such a short time frame and only in Egypt?  Either these scientists need to  accept it as a true account of what actually happened or they need to TOTALLY dismiss it.

Answer 7

Isn't this a movie...called the Reaping??http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0444682/

Lakes and rivers turning to blood was usually debunked by algae blooms or hazardous waste. This would contaminate the water supply causing the livestock to die, frogs to die, and also can result in boils, or so the movie goes on to say.

Answer 8

I do not have a link, sorry.  But I do recall watching a documentary on the subject.  Could scientist be right...maybe.  But I prefer to believe what God said in his word.