Question:

I really don't get this at all..?? Please help?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

I know not that the main idea is whist.. but I have ADD and it's so hard for me to read this and completely understand it? I'm having so much trouble

But what would the secondary ideas be? I'm trying to make a concept map.. Would it be the words calculating, eshewing, frivolous, faculty, christendom, proficiency, legitimate, derived, manifold, and multiform?

Whist has long been noted for its influence upon what is termed the calculating power; and men of the highest order of intellect have been known to take an apparently unaccountable delight in it, while eschewing chess as frivolous . Beyond doubt there is nothing of a similar nature so greatly tasking the faculty of analysis. The best chess-player in Christendom may be little more than the best player of chess; but proficiency in whist implies capacity for success in all these more important undertakings where mind struggles with mind. When I say proficiency, I mean that perfection in the game which includes a comprehension of all the sources whence legitimate advantage may be derived . These are not only manifold but multiform , and lie frequently among recesses of thought altogether inaccessible to the ordinary understanding. To observe attentively is to remember distinctly; and, so far, the concentrative chess-player will do very well at whist;

 Tags:

   Report

2 ANSWERS


  1. please give a try to transwebtutors.com. you will find it a good one.


  2. Sounds like the author is describing whist as something that takes so much more skill to master and play than chess.  Chess is no slouch, but a master at whist may well be a master at all things.  Is this quoted from something?  It sounds like it was written by an Englishman in the 1700's.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 2 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.