I think that 9/11 was planned by certain persons within the united states government.What do you think?

Question

The world trade centre goes down.Both bulidings collapse exactly the same as if they were demolished by bombs.A third buliding that was untouched also collopsed.Bush begins war on Afghanistan hunting bin laden(former associate of the bush family)and then suddenly turns to Iraq lying about weapons of mass destructiuon which have never been found.America finally gets Saddam who was helped into power by the USA.Who benefits the most out of 9/11?

Answer 1

I think you been smoking pot!

Answer 2

I think you need to put down the peace pipe Adrian!!!!

Answer 3

I think you are right on. Why did Bush walk into that classroom 3 min. AFTER the first plane hit? Why did he stay after the second? Why were the Bin La Dins quickly flown out of the U.S. , by our government, although all all traffic was grounded? Why is the hole in the pentagon too small for a plane, and no plane parts found?Only office equipment? Why did towers 1 & 2 appear to be imploded, as was #7, even though it was not damaged?

Answer 4

The attacks were not only planned from within the US Government but were planned by those who hold power over the US Politicians aka.. the Shadow Government.

http://www.4rie.com/

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shado...

http://truedemocracy.net/td3/shadow/s03....

I keep hearing from the Nay-Sayers of how we in the Truth Movement are contradicting ourselves by saying that Bush is a part of 9/11 and that he is also an idiot.  I, for one, has never said Bush is an idiot.  I don't know, but I believe his is a socially awkward Sociopath.  Sociopaths commonly have trouble with social interactions giving them an awkward dumb appearance.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_...

http://www.serendipity.li/wot/conover01....

Instead of reporting on REAL news the Media has pushed the "Bush is a Moron" agenda.  Sure some truther's probably do believe that, but that idea is not supported by the Movement as a whole.  It's the media and it's probably an idea that is supported by the government to keep people from learning the real truth about our president.  

They make Bush out to be almost endearing and goofy at the same time.. and it conceals the wolf in sheep's clothing if you will.

Here's a couple of websites that attempt to address all of the 'conspiracy theories' relating to 9/11.  Many of them can be dismissed but there are a lot that are hard to ignore!  We have got to research this subject objectively to find the truth, and I do believe that the government has not presented us with any truth.. only it's own wild-eyed 'conspiracy theory'.

http://911research.wtc7.net/index.html

http://911review.com/

Here's a few sites that address the science that supports the Truth Movement.  Many professionals in related fields to the 9/11 attacks question the 'official story'.

http://www.ae911truth.org    architects and engineers for 9/11 truth

http://www.pilotsfor911truth.org  pilots for 9/11 truth

http://wwwpatriotsquestion911.com/  engineers, architects, intelligence service, law enforcement, government officials, pilots, aviation professionals, professors, 9/11 survivors, families of victims ect.. make up this very compelling website of 9/11 questions.

Answer 5

I think that you need to think about things a bit more.

If there were explosions - how come the distinctive sounds, visual effects and smoke were absent?  

BTW - you also need to read a history of Iraq and a biography of Saddam.  Your assumptions about how he cam to power are incorrect.

Answer 6

No offense but I think you are crazy.  Check out this site for an education on the scientific matters:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technolo...

Answer 7

i agree. all those people that think u r smoking something, i think they need to watch documentaries like 'Fahrenheit 9/11' or 'Loose Change'. i have watched both and my opinions have changed significantly. plz, cut ur c**p guys and wake up to the real world

Answer 8

No doubt about it. Only a child's mind could miss the tons of obvious evidence that it was a false flag.

Answer 9

Okay, ask yourself this: was what happened on 9/11 the best means to the end of convincing America to invade Iraq?

The invasion of Iraq was sold to the public, already angry over 9/11, as a necessity due to Saddam's possession of weapons of mass destruction, i.e. small nuclear devices that could be used to perform "another 9/11."

So, if the Bush administration were going to stage an attack to justify a war, wouldn't it have been smarter to ignite a small WMD in a populated area than to cook up the whole plane bit? Wouldn't that have sold us better on invading Iraq?

Also, do you really think the government could perpetrate this vast plan to crash plans into buildings to justify a war, but then fail to "plant" WMDs in Iraq for our troops to find? Why would they endure the embarrassment of not finding the WMDs when they could have easily planted them?

You can't give them credit for being so monumentally brilliant and so classically dumb at the same time.

Answer 10

I think if bull frogs had wings they could fly

Answer 11

I think that is bogus.

Answer 12

I feel the same as everyone else who has posted an answer on here.You need to research this as we ALL know exactly who was to blame for 9/11 and it  WASN'T  the USA!!!!!!!!

Answer 13

Quite possibly and if so, it would be people above the government pulling the strings.

Do you think some of the people who answered here might benefit from spending a day with Miss Manners?   It's amazing how some of the skeptics seem to think free speech applies only to their own narrow world-view.  Good on you ask the question.  It shows you are an independent thinker, not a group-thinker.

Back to your question, nobody knows for certain but there is substantial evidence suggesting government complicity.  See this list detailing some of that evidence:

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info...

If anyone believes that failure to stop the attacks was merely due to incompetence, then I have a bridge to sell. If that were the case, why did we not see people held accountable for that "incompetence".

The documentary linked here speaks to your question.  It discusses geopolitical motives behind 9/11, historical information about flags, some of the well documented lies of President Bush, and other matters pertinent to your question.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=5...

If you have any doubt whether to believe the propaganda published by Popular Mechanics and History Channel, I have one suggestion. FOLLOW THE MONEY and the power motive all the way to the top.  They are part of corporate controlled main stream media which cannot be trusted for truthful information about anything relating to foreign policy, Iraq, Iran, the war on terror, 9/11, and many other important issues.

The corporate controlled main stream media is the reason many people bought the government's account hook, line and sinker.  Many people are uninformed about the role of today's mass media, which is to spread whatever propaganda is in the best interests of the hand-full of giant corporations who own the main stream media.  

The problem is that those giant corporations also own holdings that profit from the war and the war on terror.  There is cross-over between members of their boards and the power-players of American foreign policy.  To become more informed about the problems with today's mass media, follow these links:-

General:   http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/...

US-Specific:  http://www.globalissues.org/HumanRights/...