I was just bored and i made some trades.........?

Question

1.)http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=3209~1731~518~2792&teams=15~15~25~25&te=&cash=

2.)http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2165~2184~556&teams=23~23~14&te=&cash=

3.)http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2772~509~2782~45~1995~1998~2758~3024~862&teams=19~19~19~18~18~18~18~18~18&te=&cash=

any comments or opinions?

Answer 1

They all suck.

Answer 2

i guess they all are ok except i dont really like the third one.

Answer 3

1: its alrite but i think jeff green could turn out to b a solid player and mason is old and not very good anymore, villaneuva is inconsistent but so is wilcox so it could go either way.

2: its pretty good, the heat get a veteran center and the kings get a ok backup guard and a good PF

3: dont like it for the magic, they giv up hedo who is a great player for marbury who is prolly done and robinson who is an ok backup guard and david lee who is alrite. also the magic giv up bogans who isnt tht bad.

Answer 4

all of them are stupid.

Answer 5

1. It's okay but I'd probably say no.

2. bad for SAC, they want less bad contracts and Banks is a bad contract.

3. sucks, does not make any sense why both teams would do it.

Answer 6

1.Not bad

2.Haslam for Miller, bad move

3.Not bad but why trade for Maurberry? He's finished!!!!!

Answer 7

1.) The 1st trade makes sense giving Oklahoma City experienced players but they receive big contracts. I don't see Oklahoma City trading Jeff Green though because they consider him the future with Durant and they could become very good together.

2.) I like the 2nd trade because the Sacramento Kings receive Haslem and Banks both young guys with experience. And Haslem has the chance to be a good player. And it makes sense for Miami to get Brad Miller because he provides leadership and a solid big man to a young team and this could allow Miami to become a playoff team with Marion, Wade and Miller. Good trade for both teams.

3.) This trade doesn't work out for Orlando. They basically gave up half of their roster for aging player Marbury and Robinson and Lee. It cant work because why would Orlando trade Turkolgu after the year he had becoming a clutch player. And also another concern for Orlando would be would Marbury even play. This trade isn't likely to happen but if it did Knicks fans would be thrilled to get Turkolgu.

Answer 8

1)ok

2)good but take marcus banks out

3)not good hedo turkulo is better than stephon marbury,nate robinson,david lee

Answer 9

1)Good

2)Not that bad

3)Bad cause Marbury is done

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?...

Answer 10

They're all ok.

Answer 11

i do like the first one it gives oklahoma some experienced players and bucks young players

nice job on the 2nd one it gives miami the true center they needed since shaq

i dont get the last one

but overral nice trades

Answer 12

first ones ok the rest suck

Answer 13

1. Good

2.Bad

3.Great

Answer 14

1. Oklahoma will not make this trade because Wilcox is better than Villanueva though the latter has more potential but Green for Mason is not good. Mason might be better player and dunker but Green is younger. Mason is in the twilight of his career and Green is just in his sophomore season.

2. Brad Miller for Banks and Haslem looks fair trade for me. I like Miller. He is an all-star afterall. Haslem is just a solid forward. He can just be a backup in other teams. Miami needs a center because they have Beasley who is a forward and this trade seems fair.

3. The last one seems to be complicated though. I doubt it will happen.

Answer 15

1) Villanueva is like Green (PF with SF skills, although Green is gonna be better and is a part of the OKC Core.) bad trade for OKC. they lose Wilcox whos pretty decent. and they get Mason who's not that bad but he needs a premier point guard for him to shine. Westbrook aint ready yet.

2)If im a heat fan i'd be delighted. they lack depth at C right now. and those two that were traded were certainly expendable. now if im a Kings fan, id probbly think twice. not sure if that center from Washington, forgot his name Spencer something. can take over the starting spot and be a solid contributor.

3)i would not give up Hedo and Bogans for Nate and Lee. Hedo is like the game finisher for the Magic, they give him the ball when time's about to run out, and Nate and Lee are just solid players while Hedo is like a notch under being a speical player, although he's nowhere near the stars in the league, never will be.(notice that i didnt mention marbury and the other scrubs from Magic. they suck anyway)