There is a rumour spreading throughout the Internet that Sarah Palin's newborn son is in fact her grandson, the son of Palin's 17-year-old daughter, Bristol.
For the story in more detail, see the following links...
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/145838/319/386/581332
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223
To summarize:
-Sarah only announced her pregnancy on March 6th, claiming she was 7-months pregnant. Her aides and coworkers were shocked as she certainly didn't appear pregnant at all. On April 18th, newspaper reports said Trig Palin was born a month premature yet still weighed over 6 pounds.
-Sarah's daughter Bristol, 17, had been taken out of her high school for 5-8 months citing Mono. Yet during this period Bristol was pulled over 3 times for driving violations. More recent pictures of Bristol show her wearing what may be a wedding ring.
-There is a lot of pictures and video as well as a lot of other circumstantial evidence in the links above that would seem to suggest that Trig is actually Bristol's son, not Sarah's as she claims.
So.. IF this is true (and it may be a big if)...
a) At first glance, is it any of our business?
b) If Sarah Palin would concoct such an elaborate fabrication to cover up the incident, does anyone want her as VP? What else would she be willing to lie about?
c) It would seem that her reason for the lie would be on religious grounds. Is this a good VP?
d) If she's protecting her own political career, is Bristol not now suffering for her mother's ambition? How many other unwed teenage mothers have this much scrutiny? Isn't Sarah being a bad mother?
Tags: