If AGW alarmist can't get basic facts right, how can they understand more complicated science?

Question

If AGW alarmist can't get basic facts right, how can they understand more complicated science?

Answer 1

you do not need science to understand Global Warming its effects on Nature and the effects of people on nature

separate issues but interrelated ,

all you need is half a brain and eyes

There is a series that you can download easy ,called

bbc,Planet earth by David Attenborough.

About 15 ---700mb videos

this is a photographic team that has been filming Nature stories all over the world ,for a very long time .

In 3 of the episodes called --the future--saving species

the future--living together ,ice worlds ,

they compare films they made before of places and species to what they are filming now in the same places.

Many scientists give  commentaries as well .

And whole migrations of animals involving millions have disappeared in only 20 years

Ice sheets,glaziers have gone

They say about half of the worlds forests have gone in the last 300 years

Half of the natural  habitats,like wetlands , ice fields tundras,mountain vegetation and rain forests . in the last 50 years,and all of the inhabitants with it

CHECK THE CLOCK FOR THE SPEED

http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf



Global warming is a component in a group of destructive forces at work ,it is not the only one , but  other factors which we are responsible for ,are rapidly making it the worst .

We are now  witnessing a mass   Extinction of animals and plants of Biblical proportions,equal since the disappearance of the dinosaurs.

Who cares what it is called or WHY EXACTLY  IT IS HAPPENING ,What or who is to blame

If we want to save ourselves as a specie ,we have to address

the problems

Apparently we can correct most of the destructive factors

with disciplines ,changes of attitude and habits.

A diminishing of the world population is essential especially in poor and densely populated areas.

a world sustainable number BASED ON BIO RESOURCES  is 3 billion,

And so far we can still do it voluntary,There may come a time when the governments will take harsh actions .

If they are not already doing this underground

Answer 2

Like which facts?

Like what complicated aspects of science?

Answer 3

Can ANY of you skeptics actually name a SPECIFIC fact?  Or is this just some vague argumentum ad hominem?

Answer 4

They do not want to understand the facts. It gets in the way of their agenda.

Answer 5

AGW believers prefer science fiction to fact.  The IPCC reports and sites like realclimate are full of extraordinary assertions that are not supported by any published papers.

Answer 6

We can, so we can.

Answer 7

Some of them do, but there's always a problem with omission, and misdirection. I guess the chalk board just ain't big enough. I'm going to wait for the condensed version to come out.

Answer 8

for a PHD you do seen to rant alot.

Answer 9

What a stupid, unsupported question.

Answer 10

CO2 has very little, if any thermal qualities and is at the mercy of its surroundings.  CO2 is not a heat source.  CO2 does not have magical powers.

Yet we in Southern California are now going to have to pay for it?  For a freakin fantasy?  That is the most ridiculous thing that I have ever heard of....

Answer 11

I guess Jello needs another best answer.  

In your case, the absence of content does not substitute for getting facts correct.  Anyway, did you notice my comment about how skeptics seem to be more likely to play fast and loose with credentials?  I am relieved however, you aren't asserting that Vikings sailed through the NW passage to colonize Newfoundland.