If Bill and Hillery really care Y not spread the 11 + million she spent on her campaign?

Question

Would it have been better to give it to the poor.How many familys or single Mom's would be better off with some of that money Jest 1,000.oo per house will go a long way.

Answer 1

just giving money directly to poor people is not going to have any useful long-term effect.

how do you choose which 11,000 houses to give the money to?

what happens when that £1000 is used up?

how do you know they'll use it sensibly?

we need long-term solutions to poverty, not just hand-outs.

Answer 2

Yes, it would have been better to give it to the needy people. I agree with you. Instead, she is a selfish jack- a s s who only thinks about herself...and people want her as President.

Answer 3

Yeah, and why dosent Bush just hand out all the money he made on his oil war he created, him and cheney sure made quite a profit out of all of us. But Im sure you already knew that. Obama and Mccain should do the same thing as well, and mine as well throw in Kerry and Gore from the previous elections.       The h**l does it matter how much they spend, its there money. Are you handing out all your spare change even if its a few cents everytime you have the opportunity? didnt think so

Answer 4

I understand that John Kerry (he was in Vietnam, don't you know) spent $1 BILLION dollars on his 2004 election campaign. He definitely would have been better off to just buy the American electorate.