I live in a different state than the condo I own. My personal (auto/home) insurance agent specified that, besides the Homeowner's Policy that covers the condo, the renter should get "renter's insurance" with $300,000 liability.
I talked with a lawyer (from the state where the condo is located) and she said she'd have to look at the rental lease and the insurance policy, since the language dictates the terms.
Obviously, the renter doesn't have the renter's insurance yet as he hasn't moved in yet.
The language of the "Insurance" clause in the Residential Lease Agreement is as follows:
"TENANT is required to purchase renter's insurance. Landlord and Landlord's broker shall be named as an additional insured on any such policy. LANDLORD shall not be liable for any damage or injury to TENANT, or any other person, to any property occurring on the Premises or any part thereof, or in common areas thereof. TENANT agrees to indemnify, defend and hold LANDLORD harmless from any claims for damages. TENANT understands that LANDLORD's insurance does not cover TENANT's personal property. Even if it is not a requirement of this Agreement, TENANT understands that LANDLORD highly recommends that TENANT purchase renter's insurance."
Tags: