If Nascar said ''No passing '' except 3 times would that save fuel and the environment at the same time

Question

If Nascar said ''No passing '' except 3 times would that save fuel and the environment at the same time

Answer 1

WOW your brilliance, your genius.....I am in awe.

Answer 2

I THINK NASCAR HAS DONE ALOT OF GOOD THINGS FOR DRIVER SAFETY,BUT I ALSO THINK THEY'VE BECOME SOMEWHAT OF A BULLY,I THINK THEY ORT TO GO BACK TO THE WAY IT USED TO BE AND LET THEM RUN AS FAST AS THEY CAN,HENSE THE TERM "RACING" THEY CAN'T PASS NOW,BECAUSE OF THE OFFICIALS(DICTATORS)

Answer 3

This has got to be the lamest question, so I'll simply say NO.

Answer 4

PLEASE PLEASE do not give themm any ideas  The race is already going down hill with there assine rules this question is so stupid NASCAR might tthink about it

Answer 5

stupid tree hugger

Answer 6

Hey Tree Hugger, isn't there a rain forest screaming for you somewhere?

I do NOT see how that would make ANY difference - at all!

Answer 7

We live in the "It's all about me world" so who cares if we save the planet. What do we have to look forward too. Look at our choices for president.What a joke

Answer 8

i'll say no to

Answer 9

Already been proven exhaust doesn't cause a problem, that's hype is all.

They can't pass now, positions are only gained or lost in the pits.

Answer 10

That is the stupidest idea in the world. Why would Nascar do something that dumb? Instead of something that ridiculous, it would make more sense to shorten the races.

Answer 11

only if they said it to the general public. But NASCAR doesn't have that jurisdiction.

Answer 12

WHAT??? .... huh, NO passing... its a RACE.  You are supposed to pass.  So, let me get this straight...  If you pass someone three times and you are not winning the race, you might as well go to the garage, cuz you can't pass anyone else.  Or, you just stay behind the guy in front of you hoping he wrecks... but, if you pass the wreck, is that a 4th pass and your disqualified???? I'm so confused.

Answer 13

As far as the envirovment, nope, no help there....that global warming myth needs to end soon.....

As far as saving fuel....yeah, it would, but not that much on the track.   how it would save fuel would be by reducing the number of drivers in the country.   First, it would completely kill the sport....Because no one would even bother driving to the tracks to watch the race.  That would basically kill the sport, so the racing would end, and you would save fuel there too.  That would cause a mass suicide in our country of several hundred thousand die hard nascar fans, and they would no longer drive, so that would save tons of fuel.  

so, you can either keep Millions of dollars going for research on BS like global warming and greenhouse gases, which scientist tell us won't make a difference at all if a huge volcano erupts(that would produce more Greenhouse gases than Mankind could produce in a century and your "environment" would be shattered anyway) Or you can put a higher value on human life and its quality.   But go ahead and keep up your wonderful Crusade to save a planet that could destroy itself without our help at any time.....I'm sure you have nothing better to do.....like enjoying life.

Answer 14

To heck with the environment!!

Answer 15

Trees need hugs too!!

Answer 16

no.

'nuff said.

Answer 17

what the c**p. its a race. you are supposed to pass people. thats c**p lol. that only gives the drivers 3 shots at making it to the lead.