If Palin did abuse her power to carry out a personal vendetta, will that be seen as a negative to republicans?

Question

keeping in mind the shenanigans of the Bush administration...

Answer 1

She wanted her ex brother-in-law fired because he's a corrupt policeman who beats on women

The Clintons fired an entire travel agency (good people, some of whom had been there for 20 years, one of whom was about to retire with full benefits), just so they could give their friends jobs.

Which is worse?

Answer 2

  If there is any truth in it,it will be squashed by the republician party.

Answer 3

She has an excuse.  Hormones!  Its her sisters ex-husband, she just wanted to help her little sis out.

Answer 4

karl rove will endorse that  

Answer 5

Prove it first. Then we'll talk.

She has said she has nothing to hide and welcomes the investigation.

When the investigation is over perhaps we should investigate the Dems that made these charges.

Her record is impeccable. You can't say the same for some of those bringing these baseless allegations.

Answer 6

Hmmm.  From what I'm hearing.  Its very possible that she acted within the rights of her office...she dismissed a commissioner for not dismissing her former brother in law.  She claims the brother in law was abusing his family.  

Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens.

Answer 7

As soon as the Democrats find Obama's TWENTY YEAR attendance in an anti-white and anti-America church as negative.

McCain/Palin '08