If Palin ran for President back in 2007, would you have voted for her?

Question

Thank you.. Your Name Here!!

Let me re-phrase my question for sum of the &*%#^ that need this...

If Palin was running for President at the start of the elections would you have voted for her?

Answer 1

I think what you mean is, had she began seeking the nomination of the GOP in '07, would we have voted for her.  Answer... no.  She'd be a distant memory by now.

Answer 2

Biden ran for President in 1988, and he didn't win then. He didn't win in 2008 either. I didn't vote for a President in 2007. If you did, you need to hire a good defense lawyer for vote fraud.

Answer 3

Heck No..

She said yesterday...."I dont even know what a Vice President is supposed to do"

HA!!!!!!!!!!!

No, i wouldnt vote for her for president, let alone will i vote for her for VP.

GO OBAMA!!

Answer 4

Yes, certainly

Answer 5

Palin can only get there if she inherits the job, do you think these Republicans would vote for her, I sure don't, but John McCain has shoved her down there throat now so they have to grin and bear it.

Answer 6

No, because Ron Paul was on the ballot.

She's better than McCain, though.

Answer 7

No she is republican.

Answer 8

There was an election in 2007? News to me.  

Answer 9

uhh, no. and i wont in 2008.

Answer 10

well for 1 thing we didnt have eletions in 2007.

And no i would not vote for that person.

Why?

because i have no idea who that person is, and also because i think this country don't need a president.

I think this country wuld do waaaaay better without a president.

:)

Answer 11

You mean because she is a woman?

Sure....Democrat or Republican, makes no difference....but just because she is a woman - right!

Answer 12

Why would she have run in 2007 when there wasn't an election?  

Answer 13

we didn't elect president in 2007 idiot

Obama says:

"typical black person "

Answer 14

Even if I was Republican,I wouldn't because she's inexperienced

Answer 15

PAT BUCHANAN 08!

Answer 16

= In 2002, Sarah Palin finished her four year term as mayor of Wasilla. She ran for Lt Governor and lost the primary. The winner was Frank Murkowski, who had been Senator for 22 years. On December 4, 2002, Frank Murkowski resigned his Senate office. Sarah Palin was on his short list as a potential appointee to finish the last two years of his Senate term, however Governor Murkowski decided to appoint his daughter, It was probably a real blow to her at the time.

= It was probably a bad move on Frank's part. Sarah Palin came back four years later and beat Frank Murkowski in the Republican primaries and then beat the Democratic candidate and won the governership.

- It's a funny turnabout. Lisa Murkowski is ending up with what will probably be a long career in Alaska politics, while Sarah Palin is running for VP (and possibly a future candidate for president).

= SARAH BARRACUDA!

--------------------------------------...

The answer to your question is no. She was a nice pregnant governor of a very tiny state. She would have celebrated her first anniversary as a governor on December 4, 2007. It is hard to imagine people could take her seriously as a candidate. However, a presidential candidate is different than a VP candidate. No matter what people say, the odds are extremely high that John McCain will live through his term.

Answer 17

No.   I don't know that much about Palin but no way a person that has served as a small town mayor and half a term as a governor could have the credentials to run the most powerful nation on earth.   At least Obama has Senate experience and a law degree.   She took some political science classes.     The Republicans have gone totally crazy on this one.