0 LIKES LikeUnLike
Rhesus negative blood is supposedly not of primative origin (or that its not descendant from the blood of primates) some speculate it is alien, mutation, or even repitilian. Why hasn't anyone done research to see if rh negative blood is compatible with anything else. What are it's origins? Nothing comes from no where.
Tags:
i think rh positive factor just means homonid blood not monkey blood . perhaps the monkeys do not predate early homonids? hmmmm i doubt and ppls decended from monkeys ,but rather monkey and homonids had a common ancestor .
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I must disagree that Rh Negative blood is a "mutation". Did you know that the least likely cells in the body to mutate are blood cells? Also, even if this "mutation" had actually occured, it certainly would not have spread from generation to generation so perfectly, with all the A,B,O,AB blood groups represented within its spread, nor would it have maintained its percentage of the population at roughly 15% so consistently.
Also, if this "mutation" actually prevented the body from creating functional "Rhesus Proteins", then did this mutation occur simultaneously AND in multiple individuals? Think about it. To get an Rh negative person BOTH parents have to carry the Rh negative gene whether as a genotype expression or a phenotype expression. If ONE person were the victim of such a mutation, it would have been absolutely impossible for that person to pass the RH negative gene onto others because all other potential breeding partners would only carry RH positive as a pheno/geno type to pass on, making the combination of "negative + negative" impossible for the fetus to receive. So, do you mean to suggest that this mutation happened to an entire population of people? At the same time? And effected them in the exact same way? Regardless of their individual circumstances?
Nonsense!
Latest activity: earlier. This question has 4 answers.