If a multiculturalists’ immigration programme is a good thing then why If you analyses things?

Question

on cost verse return some communities are a net negative?

Unwilling to integrate into the society they choose to be separate.

So based upon government stats why import people who will be a drag on the economy & also do not abide by basic liberal concepts?

I will add evidence links latter - as I do not want any preconceived ideas.

So if a 'cultural group' is a negative why allow immigration?

Answer 1

Also they forget to mention places like Scotland and Northern Ireland that have been part of Britain for hundreds of years with sizable separatist populations. If people of the same race, basic religion and very similar cultures cant integrate over centuries, how can it possibly work with Somalians or Bangladeshi. Its madness.  

Answer 2

Multiculturalism is not working.

There is only 12 days of food left in UK.

When the food riots begin, you'll see what I mean about care and share.  Everything is going down the pan here in UK and it's all the fault of the UK.gov who blame the people.

Where I live we have this massive Hindu fest every year.  I have no objections except that it has squeezed out UK native culture.

I would not mind so much except that we only have 0.9% of Hindus actually living in my borough.

If you suggest an English fest, they just say you are being racist.

Answer 3

You shouldn't. Diversity is perversity. It is a clash of civilizations.

Answer 4

Look at East London. Was once a nice place, now if you are White you are lucky if you get out alive.

Answer 5

UK has bad immigration program. UK Immigration gave & still giving refugee status to any fake tom d**k & harry.

If u compare UK with Canada. Canada has more multi culturism in it with many nations legally immigrating rather we hardly hear, "immigrants have taken our jobs"... or "immigrants are not integrating" .. or "too many mosques" (There are many mosques there & i have seen them).  & why is it so? Because, Canada encourages educated decent skilled people to immigrate to Canada & doesn't accept any refugee like UK.

90% Refugees coming to UK are fake & only economic migrants who are useless in their own country since they are less educated or just illiterates who enter UK and just start to claim benefits. Their lack of English knowledge puts them back to find any work & they become scroungers.

UK should simply stop taking any asylum seeker, refugees should apply refuge in nearest safe country from their home, UK may be too far to reach yet they do, how? Taking asylum seeker policy should go. UK should encourage skilled workers immigration like Canada & Australia so they come & help UK industry, work market & economy as they are doing to Canada & Australia. Those skilled labour is usually educated & in proficient in language, they do integrate & are positive asset.

So a healthy educated multi culturism is good for any country, not the one we see in UK.

Answer 6

I really have no idea why they do it and i am always willing to learn.Grammar has nothing to do with common sense but those that tend to pick on others Grammar seem a little lacking in common sense.

Answer 7

For many years the Labour party opposed controls of economic immigration against the basic instincts of their supporters.

The UK has supported many waves of migration over the years and all integrated into the fabric and culture of the host population.. BUT theses were mainly political immigrants fleeing from persecution; Huguenots, Jews etc. These waves successfully integrated with the host population, because they were thankful to have found a haven.

It is only in the past 30 years or so that we have admitted people whose sole aim appears to be to live off state benefits and actively avoid integration into the host culture.

Additionally the sheer numbers are putting undue strain on the social infrastructure; hospitals, schools, housing and so on.

The UK has always, quite rightly, had a open-door policy in admitting the persecuted.

Now however there is strong evidence the Left's experiment of multiculturalism has failed and it will be difficult to guard ourselves from the hatred of some of these new immigrants whose aim is to destroy the culture of the UK.

The answer to your question is to ask the likes of Tony Blaire and other Left-wing politicians why they pursued this policy of immigration madness.

Answer 8

i think i know what you're saying. lol . all i can say is, we have never needed to import people to work. we can do our own cleaning we can do our own bus driving. we should unite. stand together and tell the governments of uk and europe to F U CK off. leave us alone. we  are the english people and we would like to stay that way.

Answer 9

It s all part of the New World Order agenda

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCkF0hziZ...

Answer 10

could u please provide any government stats about what u are saying !?

actually here they are and i hope u are able to understand them :

Undocumented Immigrants in Texas:

A Financial Analysis of the Impact to the State Budget and Economy

December 2006

This is the first time any state has done a comprehensive financial analysis of the impact of undocumented immigrants on a state's budget and economy, looking at gross state product, revenues generated, taxes paid and the cost of state services.

The absence of the estimated 1.4 million undocumented immigrants in Texas in fiscal 2005 would have been a loss to our gross state product of $17.7 billion. Undocumented immigrants produced $1.58 billion in state revenues, which exceeded the $1.16 billion in state services they received. However, local governments bore the burden of $1.44 billion in uncompensated health care costs and local law enforcement costs not paid for by the state.