If bush was not elected do you think there would there have been a 9/11?

Question

i mean even though they say that clinton knew about some plans for that would they really have went there if it werent for Mr Bush?

Answer 1

'i mean even though they say that clinton knew about some plans for that would they really have went there if it werent for Mr.Bush'those are your words and if your not implying that the terrorists wouldnt have followed through with the attacks because bush got elected president i dont understand the english language.reread your own question,understand what you wrote before you start claiming noones getting what your asking.ladyzani is nuts.

Answer 2

you need to read some history!!!we got attacked around six times under willy,not counting somila!!!9/11 is billy boys!!!!

Answer 3

First of all, Bush was never elected in the first place.  Both elections were fixed and stolen. Secondly the FBI stated that they did not have a shred of evidence that Bin Laden had anything to do with 911.  Thirdly, blaming either Bush over Clinton, or Clinton over Bush is ludicrous, since the idea that we have two major parties that are different is nothing more than an illusion.  Both so called opposite parties are actually the same partly, and they only pretend to be different to give us the ILLUSION that we have a choice.  They are all on the same side, the side of the globalist elite, with their New World Order agenda...which will be nothing more than an unspeakable nightmare for the people. If we the people don't wake the F**k up, and take our power back, and stop cooperating with them, we will be in a world of trouble very soon.  These Illuminati/globalist elite, are the real enemies of humanity, and if enough people don't hurry up and get that through their heads, we will be doomed.   *sm*

Answer 4

Probably.. The issue isn't about 9/11, it's about the reaction to that fact.. If Gore was pres, we assuredly wouldn't be in Iraq right now..

Edit: Funny how Clinton was responsible for both 9/11 and the attacks in '93.. Republican excuse is "Bush was only in office for 9 months".. Then they blame Clinton for the '93 bombing.. Clinton was elected in '92 and was in office around the same timeframe.. Yet he takes the blame?? Please...

Answer 5

yes

Considering the attack was planned, recruited, financed and trained for entirely on Clintons watch.

Answer 6

The World Trade center was bombed during the Clinton watch it, was just not successful and Bill fought the terrorists in court instead of in war.

Answer 7

President Bush was in office for just under nine months when the 9/11 attacks occurred. These attacks were being prepared during the Clinton administration. The Clinton administration was responsible for reducing our intelligence capabilities and military strength. The time was ripe to attack the USA. President Bush has worked hard to reverse the devastation of the Clinton administration.

Answer 8

Would the cabal have ordered it done if they didn't have their men in power to push through there agenda when it happened.

Answer 9

This is the most lame question I've seen in awhile Wow your side just well not give it up you blame him for everything How would you like it if we blamed Obama for the likes of you Now that would be hitting below the belt

Answer 10

Bin Laden was bound and determined to destroy the twin towers way before Bush was in office it wouldn't' of mattered who was in the White House

Answer 11

Remember, George Bush was still getting his feet wet in the White House and didnt upset the rest of the world leaders.  Bin Ladens attack was in the planning stages since 1996.  So it would not have mattered, well except maybe for Reagan, who was in the White House, the attacks would have happened.

Answer 12

No.  Clinton told him of the planned attack.  Bush chose to ignore his warning and refused to even look at the evidence.

BTW 9-11 has nothing to do with us invading Iraq, Bush and Cheney planned that long before 9-11.

Answer 13

Probably, Bush was in office for less than 1 year when it happened.

Answer 14

Yes.  It would be pretty dumb to think that George Bush alone changed the course of history and that the Twin Towers would be still standing except for one man alone...DUH

Answer 15

Al Quada attacked us several times in the 90s. 9-11 would have happened no matter who was president.

Answer 16

Yeah probaly, but if bush wasn't president then we would be more focused on afghanistan and not have worked on iraq.

I don't support bush

i'm saying that our nation would have been better off without him.