If in 10 years the ozone hole is still no smaller, will you question the CFC connection?

Question

If in 10 years the ozone hole is still no smaller, will you question the CFC connection?

Answer 1

ozone hole is caused by the light reflection caused between the frozen months, and the photo-chemical reaction does it and not the CFC.

THE EARLIER ASSUMPTION OF CFC'S ROLE IS FALLACIOUS

Answer 2

Already do.

Answer 3

My answer is,

If the hole is No Larger will that remove doubt of a connection.

Injury is always Rapid. Healing can take a Very Long time. Especially when we don't know How to heal the wound.

We just know what caused it.

Answer 4

Already do question it. CFCs were stopped years ago and it's still there.

Fact is, it only occurs over the pole because of the cold and the reaction with the sun on the O2 molecules in a way that has not been fully explored...

Answer 5

Good point.  The holes ( one over each pole) open and close with the seasons.  The CFC ban was a hysterical reaction to a natural occurrence.  Just like global warming, a complete fabrication with no connection to reality.

There never was a CFC connection.  One of the saddest things is the word aerosol was used used to describe partials in the air, supposedly attacking ozone.  People heard that and banned aerosol cans.  No connection to the fantasy problem at all.

Answer 6

"DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY"

???

Answer 7

First of all, not all countries have a ban on cfc's, and there are still a lot of old cars and refrigerators that have cfc's in them, and being that they are old they are probably leaking it right now.  Second and the most important fact is that cfc's effect the atmosphere for what scientists believe is much longer than they originally thought.  They now think that cfc's from the 1960's are still breaking down the ozone.  They have done some amazing studies in the Antarctica where the "hole" in the ozone is.  Did you know there is no actual hole in the ozone, it is just a layer of ozone that is much thinner than the rest of the ozone.  The ozone just doesn't go back to the way it was, I have never heard any one suggest that by removing cfc's we will get the ozone back, the idea is to prevent it from depleting even more.