If india would've batted first?

Question

If india would've batted first?

Answer 1

WiLL LOSEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Answer 2

what do u wanna ask?

Answer 3

Oh dear - did India lose again?  Perhaps they are not the great and glorious 'World Champions' they were claimed as by some users on here and every Indian newspaper when they failed to win in Australia (but were supposedly 'cheated' out of it).

Well done SRI LANKA!!  "Go you good thing " - these well mannered people will always be welcome here in Australia win or lose! (and we'll have our disagreement as civilised people)

Answer 4

We would 've got the same result! The Indian players weren't upto the mark and the result is the pathetic defeat that they got!

I hope they perform well in the next test!

Answer 5

India could have lost more pathetically

Answer 6

they will all out in 50

Answer 7

He is just putting lame excuse that If India batted first then India would have won.But whatever excuse they put, the truth is that Indian tigers surrendered meekly against Sri Lanka.

Answer 8

india would have won then

anyway cricket is just a game

Answer 9

If India would have batted first they would score some more runs around 300 but then also India would have lost because if their poor shot selection

Answer 10

result will be lost.. but not inning ... my thought

Answer 11

India would have the same advantage that Sri Lankans go but the fact remains that India bated poorly and deserved to be humiliated in the match. Now, lets see all these great players can turn the table on the sri lankans in the remaining matches.

Answer 12

Same result. No problem.

Answer 13

Same result

by a lower margin

Answer 14

then also result would be same. becoz they are afraid from murli and mendis.