The Apostle Thomas and a few other followers of Jesus, as recounted in the Bible, would not believe in the truth of the resurrection unless they actually saw with their own eyes the resurrected Christ. Even though they were told by those close to them that Jesus rose from the dead they were still quite skeptical and refused to believe. Jesus came to them to prove his physical resurrection. If they were accorded that luxury of proof, shouldn't people who are 2000 years removed from the supposed event of the resurrection be more deserving of first hand evidence than those who were CONTEMPORIES of Jesus? We, after all, have more reason to be skeptical than anyone. Could God be considered truly just and good if he condemns modern people for their lack of belief, even though the same proof was not offered to us, as it was to those who were skeptical during Jesus' lifetime?
Tags: