If there are "Real Men" does it follow that there are also "unreal Men"?

Question

If so what is the criterion for both, or do you think this terminology is as stupid as i do? Feel free to convince me that i"m missing something.

Answer 1

Stupid terminology.

It's about trying to make people fit some sort of labels ~ 'real' men don't (fill in the blanks); 'real' women (more blankfilling here), with the inserted ideas being the ones the person speaking or writing prefers.

For most of us, being 'real' is about being ourselves. We don't need an umpire, arbiter or judge.

Cheers :-)

Answer 2

Yup and the play unreal.

Answer 3

It's just a shaming tactic that mostly women use to get guys to do whatever she wants by shaming them for doing otherwise.

Just more smoke and mirrors.  Though, mostly smoke.

REAL real men don't care if women approve of what they do or don't do.  Or lesser men.

Answer 4

It's a way to use and control someone.

Answer 5

I nominate Voice of Reality for poster of the week.

Answer 6

The whole thing is lame, no thanks.

Apparently, there are quite a shocking number of men on here who think it's not their responsibility to engage in protected s*x, however. That's probably the grossest thing I've heard in at least a month.

Answer 7

Real men don't have a problem with women being equal.  Unreal men are types like dsds.  More balls than brains.