If there isn't any birth control around the World, then the food crisis will last forever and even...?

Question

it will get worse?

Answer 1

Exactly SEND BIRTH CONTROL TO THESE COUNTRYS INSTEAD OF FOOD then maybe they can produce enough food to care for their homelands.

Since most of the countrys hate us anyway why do we send them aid? if their own goverments gave a shiiiiitt about them their would be no hunger problems. Oh but thats our fault!

Answer 2

Its always the same...the poorest of the poor have the most offspring. It's time to put political correctness in the crapper and begin a global education program. Plant some condom trees soon

Answer 3

Is this myth still rolling around, that there's a food crisis because of too many children? It's not true -- it's been debunked long ago. The world has never produced more food than it is right now.

The food crisis came from a variety of sources -- the souring price of oil (makes it hugely expensive to transport food), bio fuels (rich companies putting food in their gas tanks), China and India becoming more prosperous and eating as well as Westerners, and some weather disasters in key areas, to name but a few reasons. It's "a perfect storm."

As for people having lots of children in poor countries -- they do so for economic necessity. The children work the farms and other family businesses. Also, men believe that a woman must have many babies, as a reflection of the man's "power."

Interesting that the higher the literacy rate of women, the lower the birth rate.

I don't believe in forcing women to have babies any more than I believe in forcing them to limit the size of their families. It's fascist to suggest either. Instead, if you are so concerned that they are having too many children, why don't you give them access to education and healthcare and let them decide for themselves?

Answer 4

GO AND TELL YOUR IDEA TO THE VATIKAN . AND YOUR CHURCH. IF YOU HAVE ONE  ALL THESE RELIGOUS FANATICS TELL" NO CONDOMS " ANTI -- PILL  ETC. BUT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT  HOW TO PUT FOOD IN THEIR  CHILDREN  MOUTH !! AND FORGET ABOUT EDUCATION  ALTOGETHER.       IT IS DISGUSTING

and for some people  which think children will take care of the parents  some day "" you are wrong " come to colombia or any of these c.-american  states and look what is going on

Answer 5

Here is a thought, lets not use food as a political tool in the international diplomacy theater. We wield more political economic power from our stock piles of food surplus than OPEC did in its hay day of monopolistic price control of oil resources. We have enough food and the capability to feed most of the starving people on the planet. In addition, teach them how to improve on their own capabilities to produce food for themselves.

Note: It would not hurt to teach them the value of birth control while we are at it. But do not get your hopes up. The third world families have many children out of necessity. They're needed as a support system. They do not have social programs to rely on. They need to have 8 children so that when they are at the age when we send our old folks to nursing homes they have a few children left alive to take care of them.

Answer 6

Mostly due to the ego and constant sexual desire of human males, the present world is vastly over populated.  If all nations would limit child birth to one child per male(sounds like China doesn't it)then the world population would slow down and the present food and water supply may be sufficient.  If not, then famine and starvation are inevitable.  Plus, with grains and rice, etc., going into producing ethenol, famine in poorer countries is here.

Answer 7

maybe if there was more available in third world countries there would be less problems for them