Question:

If women ruled the world....?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

...would there be more peace?

 Tags:

   Report
Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

31 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date  |  Rating

  1. I don't get what you have in mind.

    It is happening every where.

    Sri Lanka, India, UK, Israel had women prime ministers to head governments. Golda Meir of Israel and Indira Gandhi of India won wars, even.

    Now we have women as German Chancellor, Chilean President, Indian President.

    Coming to your point 'ruling the world'. You want the secretary general of UN a woman? It is no big deal; can happen any time. Appears to me that you are in your own world; Come out of it.


  2. No.  At first they would change a lot of things around to their perspective.  That would create a lot of unrest.  Plus women are humans and make mistakes too.  Utopias never work out as planned.

  3. Nations would pretend to be allies to eachothers faces while the nukes were in the air.

  4. The feminist movement wants you to think so e.g.

    "Men are the enemies of women. ...Without men the world would be a better place: softer, kinder, more loving; calmer, quieter, more humane." Ann Oakley (1984) Taking It Like a Woman.

    But we have seen enough warlike female leaders in modern times (e.g. Thatcher, Indirha Ghandi, Golda Meir, Chandrika Kumaratunga etc) to know that woman=peace is nonsense.

    And look at all the violence that the feminist movement is inflicting on men by having them arrested or jailed for ridiculous reasons (see Section 4 here http://www.freewebs.com/feminism-evaluat...

    And they are making laws like these all over the world.

    So the answer to your question is: GET REAL.

  5. I think that as long as we think of anyone ruling the world there will not be peace.

    What about sharing the world?

  6. Nope. We fight a bit differently than men do, but we still fight. Remember high school? I bet you had more problems with your female friends than with the guys! LOL Women aren't better than men, or more peaceful. We're just different.

  7. The only differences in male / female leadership qualities, per research, are due to gender acculturations that are waning and will eventually equalize.  But, at this time, as with the all-female top leadership of New Zealand, which won Transparency International's "Least Corrupt" government award a few years ago, female leadership tends for now to be considerably less corrupt and less self-serving "Good Old Boy" based.

    Because Big Business worker exploitation and plunder paradigms and the arms industry remains entrenched in our societies and economic reality revolves around war industries, female leaders today must operate within that system to be effective and to survive.  It will not be a female leader alone or a male leader alone who rescues us from that paradigm.  It will be a rise in both men and women united to overthrow that system.  The philosophical school of feminism that addresses that "system" is called, "Radical Feminism", not to be confused with popular use of the word "radical" to mean extreme.

  8. Unfortunately, I don't see world peace happening any time soon.  And, I especially do not foresee world peace with others ruling others, regardless of gender, race, etc.

  9. ladies r natural ruler. when man talk mindly, sure it is the loan given by lady. she is best president but man is better prime minister in the democracy of family or in wide range

  10. Thankyou Patois.

    That was a great answer.

  11. It would be in a shambles, all the accounts would be overdrawn, all the toilets would be clogged,nothing mechanical would work and everything would be late ! , But it would be very clean and nicely decorated.

  12. Wars would be fought over shoes, clothes and vibrators.

  13. Yes.  Women give birth, and would not send their children to war over trivial things or to improve a corporation's bottom line, as a hidden form of corporate welfare.  If women did go to war it would be to prevent genocide and the enslavement of children by gangs.  There would be stiffer penalties for rape, especially for child molestation.

  14. I doubt it. Women bring about alot of drama and play games.

    I'm a girl and I can admit that.

    Could a women be President and do alot of good, yes. But I think if it was nothing but women you'd get alot of radical feminists and stubborn women not listening to the real needs of the people.

  15. Women can take wrong decisions as much as men can do.. so I don't think so.

  16. There might be more peace, but their would also be more starvation and poverty. There would also be less technological advancement and less personal freedom.

    Think about it....

  17. No.

  18. More complaining and landfill sites filled with shoes and handbags.

  19. Possibly. But Anna M makes a good point.

    Mike T - more poverty and starvation? How do you figure that? Women produce the majority of the world's food supply and up to 80% of the food supply in developing countries. If women had more land rights in developing countries they could produce even more. Moreover it has been shown time and time again that when women in developing countries are given control of the family budget more is spent on their family's needs, especially on their children - when men have control over money they spend it on themselves, especially on alcohol.

  20. They would be telling us what we can eat.

    Jan Perry, a Los Angeles city-council member, is spearheading legislation that would ban new fast-food restaurants like McDonald's and KFC from opening in a 32-square-mile chunk of the city, including her district

  21. yes. alot more. men are so obsessed with thier pride that they want all the power they can have. which causes wars. women are more for sharing and going green than men are so therefor the world would be an overall better place.

  22. Nope

    http://groups.google.co.ke/group/alt.sup...

  23. Wow, thats something to think about.

    Most men would be angry/sexist and try to overthrow the women and lots of guys would turn to the other side if you know wut im sayin.

  24. I think the world would be a better place if men and women could learn to work together using our strengths as a benefit to all.  Any gender with complete control over another is wrong.

  25. throughout history we have had points in time where a Queen ruled the known world for a given people. History does not show us that women are better or worse.

  26. Probably

  27. No, but wars would include a lot more scratching and hair-pulling.

  28. It would be the same in my opinion.

  29. We would with pay have off of work the first three days of our monthly cycles.

  30. ummm maybe so because their egos arent as big as a man's and they wouldnt feel the need to go tryna prove their BALLS to everyone

  31. No, women are only human too, and there are some CRAZY women out there...........................
You're reading: If women ruled the world....?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 31 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Register Now
Unanswered Questions