Bush versus Gore, Bush versus Kerry, most people voted for the person they considered "the lesser of two evils" - look how that turned out.
Might there be a snowball effect if third party candidates, even combined, get 5-10% of the vote? Might the debates, at least the first 1 or 2, feature third party candidates in 2012? Might that not at least open up the possibility of new ideas?
Does the label "hope and change" or "maverick" slapped onto old ideas really make them new?
Tags: