Impeachment hearings for Clinton over Monica, Silence for Bush and Iraq, why?

Question

I think It just goes 2 show that money rules everything around u and me

Answer 1

It really does make me wonder...

While what Clinton had done was really taboo, the most he hurt was his marriage. Bush on the other hand has hurt the country and the world. What gives.

Answer 2

Because everybody knows the Clinton Impeachment was just politics. We don't want to respond in kind. I'll bet you lots of people in his administration will be doing jail time after he gets out of office though.  

Answer 3

Republicans are above the law Just like when the Big d**k cheney Shot that poor attorney and everyone looked the other way Republicans are above the law  I bet OJ Simpson is a Republican  

Answer 4

Clinton choreographed those investigations as a distraction for his involvement with as well blowing the opportunity to nab Osama Bin Laden whitewater

Answer 5

Obviously the Republicans believe that violating your wedding vows is much worse than violating the Constitution.  

Answer 6

How hard is this? Clinton lied on the stand while under oath!

Bush had every right according to the Constitution to go to war. You know that whole Commander and Chief thing!

Answer 7

Despite what the right-wing press says, they are really in control of media and the congress.  W can do no wrong and the Dems are afraid of making a fuss and getting bad publicity.  Let's hope the get their male parts back when they take over the            White House.     Go Steelers!

Answer 8

You know...we should just feel a terrific sense of relief that January 20th is coming soon.  He has earned his place in history--it's a place that few people would like to be.

Answer 9

Good for clinton for being able to get some at his age. Bush and his vendetta is another thing.

Answer 10

Give one reason how money can be tied to Clinton's impeachment.

The two situations are completely different. Bush has not done anything illegal, if he had then charges would have been filed by this point. There are plenty of Democrats controlling congress who would love to nail him to the cross, but they simply can't because no crime was committed.

Clinton's impeachment however, did NOT arise because of his misconduct with an intern. He was impeached because he lied under oath about the affair, you know, a crime known as Perjury.  

Answer 11

How difficult is this, for you to understand?

Clinton's problem was personal, then when he was found out, he lied under oath.

President Bush was using the information supplied to him by the CIA and other intelligence sources. Whether it was faulty or not, Saddam was a menace and a mass murderer, and DID have WMD. This was not reported so much by the liberal-biased press, since that would go against their desire to show Dubya in a negative way.

WMD includes Nuclear, Biological and Chemical weapons.

A very large amount of yellow cake was found in Iraq, as well as centrifuges only used for the manufacture of nuclear weapons. The yellow cake has been recently quietly shipped to Canada for reprocessing into nuclear fuel.

Biological? I don't know anything about that. Perhaps someone else does.

Chemical? Saddam had tons of it. What is worse, is that unlike other leaders in history since WWI, he had no problem with using it, as he did with the Kurds in 1988. His shell game with the inspectors, moving his mobile chemical weapons trucks around, made the inspections meaningless, and certainly indicated what he was doing. two of those trucks WERE found in the Syrian desert, just over the border from Iraq, emptied and abandoned. The stuff was gone, probably buried in the desert somewhere, but the truck cargo areas themselves were sealed with stuff ONLY USED IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS.

Now, that was the information Colin powell presented, and he was right.

Also, Congress voted on the war. With the information presented, it was the right thing to do. Bush, even as President, can not declare war on anybody, without congress's support.

Will you try to impeach the whole congress?

Edit: And as for violating the constitution, look to your own candidate. Idiot Barry violated the Logan Act a few weeks ago in Iraq.

Edit again: Rumsfeld, like Paul Bremer, were fired by the current administration for s******g up the occupation period. Rumsfeld was the fool that thought that American and British soldiers should not act as police, and that we didn't need so many soldiers to pacify the insurgency. He is also the fool that didn't plan ahead for the occupation period, or listen to Colin Powell when he had better ideas on what was to be done.

If you had Rumsfeld's job. was protected by the President for so long while doing this job so badly, then fired by the guy who was protecting you, you would probably be bitter, too. This is is just a case of a former disgruntled employee trying to get back at his boss.

The stuff was there.

Answer 12

Because Clinton was and is a piece of human garbage and George Bush is a great president. Anything else you would like to whine about?

If those idiots would have left like they were told to do they wouldn't have been floating in the street, Instead they waited for someone to decide their fate for them, where was their personal responsibility??? Didn't the mid west go through major flooding a couple months ago did you hear crying NO, people got up and did what they needed to do to fix their communities. I am so sick of the millions of lazy people in this country standing there with a hand out, put your hand on a d**n shovel and get to work you f'n freeloaders!

Let's not forget that instead of helping others when the flood was going on they were busy stealing beer. Pictures all over the news of people running around the dead bodies to steal cases of beer.Animals!

Why was it the Federals governments job? Did NO not have a mayor, did La not have a governor, they did nothing, if you want to blame someone blame them.

This is getting boring. I'm out.