In a political argument, instead of facts or logic, should I just attack the other person's patriotism?

Question

It seems to work wonders. Apparently just accusing someone of being unpatriotic, hating America, supporting the terrorists, has been the ultimate argument winner ever since 9/11.

It's also a huge time saver. You don't have to spend any time looking for any information.

Answer 1

That's an age old tactic in any debate - but your opponent on the defensive.

If he supports the Iraq war - he's a warmonger.

If he supports abortion - he's an accomplice to murder.

If he doesn't support abortion - he's anti-choice.

If he questions Obama - he's a racist.

Works every time.

Answer 2

Well all those things pretty much fit Liberals to tee so it's not namecalling it's call it like it is.

Answer 3

You mean like Harry Reid on national TV saying "the war is lost". Sorry, he is a traitor, providing comfort and encouragement to the enemy.  He should be in Leavenworth, not Senate majority leader.

Answer 4

It only works on libs, because they're always bashing our country.

Answer 5

Yes.  You should also attack:

- their economic class, especially if it is better than your own

- their religious beliefs, especially if they are Christian

- their age, especially if they are older than you

- their compassion, especially if they aren't for raising taxes or social welfare.

Answer 6

You know it seems to work for the Democrats for years.  Accuse the Republicans of racism when they are the party of slavery and KKK members like Grand Wizard Senator Byrd of West Virginia.

It's about time the fact that Democrats go around preaching hatred of America and claiming they are patriotic by being haters of America and not wearing the flag pin then wearing it.  Attend churches that preach God d**n America and hate Whitey you'll clench the Democrat nomination.

Answer 7

It might help.  Especially if you peppered your arguments with stories about your life as a captive of the Enemy.