Question:

India v England 2011 - Lalit Modi criticises BCCI for refusing UDRS , asks ICC to step in

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike


India v England 2011 - http://www.senore.com/Cricket/Lalit-Kumar-Modi-c72144 criticises BCCI for refusing UDRS , asks ICC to step in
The former http://www.senore.com/Cricket/England-c56013 in the upcoming series.
“It’s disappointing to see the BCCI continuing to turn its back on the wider use of the technology during India’s tour of England this summer”, he said.
Meanwhile, http://www.senore.com/Cricket/ICC-World-Cup-2011-c100625) to step into the matter to eliminate the BCCI’s influence from cricket, which has always been affecting the decisions.
''It is now high-time the ICC took a stand to invoke consistency across world cricket. It is nonsensical to allow an individual body (BCCI) to dictate an inconsistent policy to the rest of the world'', Modi added.
Earlier, after the 3rd edition of IPL, the BCCI claimed that Modi was involved in the financial corruption while dealing with the media rights for the event.
It seems that the former IPL chief is now trying to get harsh with the BCCI, and cited them on the UDRS controversy.       
According to Modi, UDRS has always been an effective technology, and was successfully used during the ICC World Cup 2011.
The former IPL official has also highlighted the presence of the review system in the Ashes series, last year, which helped both England and http://www.senore.com/Cricket/Australia-c746 equally.
In the ongoing Test series between England and http://www.senore.com/Cricket/Sri-Lanka-c758 in England, the review technology is also in practice effectively.
However, Modi blamed governing body of cricket in India for not accepting the technology during the upcoming series against England.
He thinks BCCI is trying to go against the ICC’s umpiring system. The cricket council seems active to ensure the accuracy of the decisions.
Earlier, the ICC also sacked, http://www.senore.com/Cricket/Ellawalakankanamge-Asoka-Ranjit-De-Silva-c55900, from its elite panel of umpiring, as both were on top of the list for making unacceptable on field decisions, most of them had been reverted courtesy to UDRS.
In the meantime, many English players also criticised India for not trusting the technology, off-spinner, http://www.senore.com/Cricket/James-Michael-Anderson-c65929, oppose the decision.
 

 Tags:

   Report
SIMILAR QUESTIONS

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 0 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.