Instead of Sarah and Bristol what if it was Hillary and Chelsea?

Question

How would Hillary and her pregnant teenage daughter be treated by the press, GOP and the scholars here at YA?

Answer 1

The difference is that Democrats support organizations that deal with pregnant teenagers where as the republicans cut funding to these organizations all the time and say that all they need is a good strong family upbringing would solve the problem. So evidently Sarah's daughter doesn't have a good strong family upbringing and if Sarah Palin can't provide a good family life then how can she be VP.

Answer 2

Chelsea would have aborted the baby before it leaked out into the press, so whatever your point, it's moot.  If she chose to keep the baby I would say "Oh well, she played, she pays"...I believe I have always held that position about Bristol Palin as well.

Answer 3

No, no, no...Palin's daughters are much more attractive.

Answer 4

Oh, Democratic women? That's totally different.

Answer 5

If it was a Democrat, no one would care because they wouldn't be HYPOCRITES.

Answer 6

The Republicans are hypocrites,they think that they can just judge everybody else, but when they are in a bad situation it is a family issue or a private issue that cannot be ridiculed.

Answer 7

It would be typical.  the democratic party is so hypocritical and arrogant.  They think they can do anything but no one else can but then it wouldn't happen to Chelsea, she'd have an abortion and kill the baby.  It's so typical.