Is ASEAN the association for self-enrichment and nepotism?

Question

Or did I miss something?

Answer 1

You mean they used the ASEAN as an organization for the purposes you mentioned? I don't think so.

It was a misfortune that it was allowed to happen. In Indonesia, setting aside questions of human rights and morality, Suharto, for all his faults, brought 8 percent to 10 percent growth annually. He probably wasted 3 percent to 5 percent on his cronies, friends and family, but the country was moving ahead. He was 77 - he's not going to live forever. Now tens of millions are impoverished. Should the Indonesians forward their complaints to ASEAN then?

The same case with the other President.  Self-enrichment is best done solo. Not via an association of several leaders. That would be a case where too many cooks spoil the broth. ;)

Answer 2

The ASEAN was formed not for the benefit of certain individuals but a forum of member countries to address regional economic, social and cultural development. It is also a vehicle in promoting security, stability, justice and the rule of law in the region.

Answer 3

ASEAN was organized for economic cooperation for the leaders to enrich themselves while in power.  The likes of Suharto and Marcos became rich because of ASEAN.