Is Bangladesh good enough to be a full member of the ICC?

Question

Is Bangladesh good enough to be a full member of the ICC?

Answer 1

Though they are a team of talented players, they have failed to perform consistently to their potential.  Hence i stronglhy feel that they are still not ready to become a full member of ICC

Answer 2

Yes, right as full member of icc.

Answer 3

They're not good enough but we need a team to fill in the spots!

Answer 4

Yes they play good cricket and shocked leading teams too

Answer 5

No.  But ICC is desperate to make cricket global.  Already test playing nations are very less out of which Zimbabwe is almost out of this elite list.  ICC cannot afford to let go one more member.

Answer 6

According to me bangladesh and Zimbabwe can be replaced by Ireland and any other good team........

Answer 7

yes there  good enough.esp whit the rate of improvement

  

Answer 8

Out of 21 ODI teams of all time, I would rank Bangladesh at 12th spot. The 11 teams above them are: Australia, South Africa, Pakistan, India, West Indies, England, New Zealand, Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe, Canada and Kenya. The teams below them are: Ireland, Bermuda, Netherlands, Namibia, Scotland, UAE, Hong Kong, USA and East Africa.

Out of 10 test match teams, I would put them at the 10th spot after Australia, West Indies, England, South Africa, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, India, New Zealand and Zimbabwe.

I do not think that Bangladesh is test class. If they are, the teams above them in ODI should also get test class. I feel that there should be Division 1 in ODIs with top 8 teams and the remaining in Division 2. In test matches, there should be only top 8 teams.

Bangladesh is useful to improve average of other team players.

Answer 9

no