Is Beatrice worth £250k per annum to us just for her bodyguard?

Question

The ghastly products of freeloaders Fergie and Andrew cost £500k each year to the overburdened taxpayers for bodyguards just to keep Andrew's puffed up ego in place.

Do we get value for money?

Answer 1

its time this  expensive royal roadshow was cancelled altogether.................

Answer 2

Fergie and her off spring aren't even British residents anymore, let the Americans pay for them!

Answer 3

It is cheaper to hire an assasin!

Answer 4

it is about time you learnt a few things to start with the British tax payer does not pay a penny towards fergie's bodyguards that is if she has one at all she is no longer a member of the royal family and therefore does not get a penny from the British tax payer at all and as for Prince Andrew he is entitled to protection like any other member of the royal family and considering the royal family cost the tax payer about 82p per person per year and the fact that they all including the Queen pay tax I think you will find we get a very good deal indeed and Prince Andrew also works very hard promoting British industry abroad

Answer 5

Thanks anyway..... the Americans don't want them either, :)

and who names their child Beatrice anyway? Unless she gave birth to a 75 year old woman...

Answer 6

Simple answer...No!

They are multi-millionaires, why can't they pay for their own bodyguards?

Answer 7

Of course not let them pay for their own protection.

Answer 8

As already indicated in the newspaper report, higher ranking royal children do not receive personal bodyguards (i.e. Zara & Peter Phillips) who are higher up in line to the throne than Beatrice & Eugenie.  If the newspaper reports are to be believed, then I think the "girls" in question need to become more responsible.  Yes, we have all been children at some stage who liked to "feel their feet" but had to curtail our "nightlife" due to financial circumstances.  How about Andrew paying for his children's bodyguard salaries ?

Answer 9

there is certainly a strong voice now in the UK regarding the  these unjustified costs of royal siblings who have no real purpose except to swan around the world on ambassadorial ventures? lol(That's a joke folks)

All the lot should be struck off the list from obtaining money under false pretences,= I thought that was against British law anyway= why have they not been prosecuted?

Answer 10

I don't know, but can I have the job for £250k?