Sanctions against a nation of any sort is always controversial because whlist it is directed against dictatorships, it hurts the civilian population.
When the masses of South Africa were demanding Sanctions against South Africa during Apartheid, the British goverment was slow to agree to this. Their argument was that it would hurt the people it was directed to help the most although the masses who supported the freedom struggle welcomed sanctions because financial prosperity meant little to them as they did not benefit to it as much as the apartheid regieme did.
The Brits were very quick to impose sanctions against Mugabe. Have they learnt from how wrong they were to react with sanctions against apartheid South Africa so slowly or are they simply hypocritcal in moving so fast with sports sanctions against Zim because now the dictator is Black.
Moreover, the Brits were especially slow with sports sanctions against South Africa and now have moved in this area very quickly.
Tags: