Is George Bush the King of United States?

Question

well Rex I didn't vote for George-and neither did the majority of the population.

And speaking of voting sirecoke--if 'we' are so smart -why did we elect a dumba$$?

And angry lizzie--the world's monarchies have been the most relentless inbreeders since the beginning of civilization.

Valerina so far has the best answer--but I hope you're not planning on voting for Queen Hillary. I'm all for democracy too--but don't confuse that with being a dumbocrat. They are as evil as the republican'ts!

Answer 1

This time next year you'll be asking the same question about Obama, Hilary or that other guy whose name I already forgot! You know who I mean - the one who should be relaxing in some mobile home park in Florida with all those other over-rich 70+ 'senior citizens'. Anyway, be thankful he's not the King because if he was then the terrible twins would be fighting for the crown when he abdicates, and would you want one of those wasters to run your country? Hey, I think Paris Hilton could do better ;-)

Answer 2

NO, he's the figurehead dictator.  The real power is d**k Cheney.

Answer 3

you don't vote for kings.  he is only the president.

Answer 4

No, only 'superior' countries have monarchs, and not ones that are away to get into a recession too! lol. Besides he wouldnt be able to be a king because kings and queens are put into power through accension from birth, not by in bred family members who have lots of cash and live in texas. lol

Answer 5

Funny that you ask this question. I recently attended a public discussion about whether ir not the U.S. is ready for a woman president (to me this question is stupid... whether a woman or a man they still have to be good at their job), and one of the speakers quoted someone who said, "... the presidency has always been a ceremonial, ritualistic, and symbolic role of a king." The person quoted was a feminist I think and said it to make a point, but the fact of the matter is our president is not our king, especially George Bush. I can see your point though. His father was president not long ago and we're at war without an official permission from Congress and our economy sucks because our back asswards leader is an idiot... wow that list could really get long.

Answer 6

lmao.. NO

Answer 7

No,he's just a president soon to be out of office.None of our presdients are royalty,sweetie! And I've been around for long enough to have seen 10 of them.They are all elected officials who have to share power with the Senate and Congress. In the sense of "royal" meaning elegance,erudition,breeding,

good taste,good manners,the closest to

"royal" were the Roosevelts and the Kennedys.

"Shrub"(George W. Bush,fils) is not royal in any sense of the word.

Answer 8

No but it is safe to say we've been royally fu**ed

Answer 9

no hes thirsty

Answer 10

No, we are smart we don't have kings. Any country that has a king is backwards.