Is Husseins domestic terrorists relationships or the lack of liberal media coverage of it concern u the most?

Question

Obama supporters risibly complain that shining a light on the Obama/Ayers relationship is a “smear” and smacks of “guilt by association.” A presidential candidate’s choice to associate himself with an unrepentant terrorist would be highly relevant in any event — does anyone think the Obamedia would keep mum if John McCain had a long-standing relationship with David Duke or an abortion-clinic bomber?

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=MmUwOTllNmMzZDNlMTljMGFmY2JkZTllYmQyOTY0ODY=&w=MA==

Answer 1

what scares me most is McCain selling arms to third world nation under the table

Answer 2

There is no "long standing" relationship. Even the National Review article says that Kurtz hasn't been able to view the files that supposedly MAY show some kind of meaningful relationship. Now how does one come to conclusions without ever having had the chance to even look at the paperwork?

Oh and you may want to inform the NSA and Homeland Security that these terrorists are walking around free promoting education reform and being productive members of their communities.

Answer 3

The National Review is hardly credible even for your imagination. Ayers is not a terrorist. he has every right to speak out about this country. It's America and you're always telling us our soldiers fought for our freedoms. Is that only white republican freedoms?