Is Islam A Satanic Religion According To Mirza Ghulam Ahmed Qadyani??

Question

"How absurd and false it is to believe that after the holy Prophet(SAW) the door to divine 'Wahi' has been closed for ever and there is no hope of it in the future till the day of Resurrection - Worship tales only. Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion? I say, by God, that in this age there is none more disgusted than myself with such a religion. I name such a religion Satanic, instead of divine."

Can someone explain it??

Answer 1

I don't get it. Everytime I see a Mohammadan in America coming on t.v. or something he/she is all humble and crying and stuff and telling everyone in the world that they are really nice people and don't hate anyone and that "Islam means 'peace'" and they want to be friends with everyone and so so so (I especially liked that really cute cover picture of "Muslims in America" on the cover of Newsweek a couple years back...). But then, when you are in your natural element you start going at it again with all kinds people, like Ahmadi Muslims. Why so double-faced? Why does it seem that you Mohammadans seem to have a problem with everyone in the world? I mean, you seem to have problems with Christians, problems with Jewish people, problems with Hindus, even problems with your yourself (like the Sunni and Shia). And you are doing this after having brutally murdered two of your own Khalifas and the grandchildren of OUR Prophet Mohammad (pbuh). You mean you still don't know why the world hates you so much? Think people, think.

Answer 2

[20:89] Then he produced for them a calf - a mere body which emitted a lowing sound. Then he and his companions said, 'This is your god, and the god of Moses but he has forgotten it and left it behind.'

[20:90] Could they not see that it returned to them no answer, and had no power to do them either harm or good?

Here Allah is saying that the calf is useless because it returned them no answer. Hazrat Ahmad (as) is agreeing with this notion. That any supposed god who does not respond, then such a religion is a disgusting religion. How can God's mouth be shut? This indeed is a disturbing affiar because then (naduhobillah) you are likening Allah with an idol. An idol can't respond and communicate with mankind, and now if Prophethood has ended, Allah can't respond and communicate with mankind.

Furthermore, this mistake the Muslims are making is exactly what the Jews did.

[40:35] And Joseph, indeed, came to you before with clear proofs, but you ceased not to be in doubt concerning that which he came to you till, when he died, you said, 'Allah will never raise a Messenger after him.' Thus does Allah adjudge as having gone astray every transgressor, doubter -

So Allah is saying that he judges has having gone astray every person who says that Allah will never raise another messenger. They first rejected a true Messenger, then they said no one will be raised up ever again. Allahs response is that thus, these people are adjudged astray, not only for rejecting, but saying Allah will never raise another Messenger.

As far as 33:40, this is explained so clearly by Muslim scholars throughout history, I present a brief synopsis.

Regarding Khatamanabiyyeen, indeed it means Seal (as in validation, mark, emblam) of the Prophets, and not finality of Prophethood.

This is what the Prophet (sa) as well as the early Muslims themselves believed.

For example.

Authentic Arabic Lexicons ((Lane); (Aqrab); (Mufradat); (Fath); (Zurqani) state that Khatam can mean 1) seal, stamp, mark, imprint, impress; 2) best and most perfect, embellishment or ornament; 3) to secure, protect oneself against a thing; 4) signet ring; 5) produce an impression or effect upon a thing; 6) the end or last part of a thing. Allah uses Khatam with a fatha, a stroke above and not with a kasra, which is a stroke below. Khatam’s primary meaning is seal, while khatim would definitively mean the last person/one.

Next I cite none other than Imam Bukhari himself.

Imam Bukhari has commented on this verse and said this means a mark on the Prophet (saw) holy person. Prophet Muhammad (saw) is Khatam in the sense that he is the possessor of the Seal of Prophets, without whose certification no one can even be considered to be a true prophet. He is Khatam in the sense that he is the best and quintessential example of a prophet. He is Khatam in the sense that like the signet ring he wore and used to seal documents,[2] he can create an impression of his character on whomsoever is worthy of receiving it. He is Khatam as he bore a birthmark[3] on his back that allowed Hazrat Salman Farsi (ra) to declare he was a true prophet. This birthmark was literally referred to as “Khatam An-Nubuwwa.”

Here are the authentic references of the above quote. Nowhere does Imam Bukhari state that it means last or Prophets. Instead he defines Muhammad (sa) as the Seal of Prophets in the sense that , " without whose certification no one can even be considered to be a true prophet"

[2] (Sahih Jami’ Bukhari, Vol. I, Book 3, #65, Book 10, #546, Book 11, #630; Vol. IV, Book 52, #189, Book 53, #338; Vol. VII, Book 72, #755-759, 761-764, 766-767; Vol. IX, Book 89, #276); (Sahih Jami’ Muslim, Book 4, #1336-1338; Ch. 11-12, Book 24, #5212-5229); (Sahih Jami’ Tirmidhi, Ch. 11, #1-8; Ch. 12, #1-9); (Sunan Abu Daud, Book 1, #19; Book 34, #4212, 4214-4215, 4217)

[3] (Sahih Jami’ Bukhari, Vol. I, Book 4, #189; Vol. IV, Book 52, 305, Book 56, #741; Vol. VII, Book 70, #574; Vol. VIII, Book 73, #22, Book 75, #363); (Sahih Jami’ Muslim, Ch. 27-28, Book 30, #5789-5793); (Sahih Jami’ Tirmidhi, Ch.2, #1-8); (Sunan Abu Daud, Book 32, #4071)

Here is the testimony of one of the most well known scholars of Islam.

Hazrat Maulvi Abul Qaseem Nantovi, the renowned founder of the Deoband Academy states, “In the conception of the masses the Holy Prophet (saw) was Khatam in the sense that he came after all the other prophets and that he was the last prophet of all. But it is evident that in the estimation of the wise no superiority whatever attaches to precedence in time or its reverse … If a prophet appeared after the Holy Prophet (saw), it would in no way affect his finality.” (Tahzirunnas, Saharanpur, pp. 3, 28)

But there is much much more evidence. Below I provide just a few more unique Hadeeth that are very relavent to this situation.

Abu Bakr is the best of men after me except a prophet should appear.”[(Kanzul Ummal)

“Abu Bakr is the best of the people after me except one who may be a prophet.”[(Tabrani Kabir Kamil Ibne Adi quoted in Jame Saghir by Imam Suyuti, p.5)

“Abu Bakr is the best of my followers except anyone who might be a prophet.”[(Dalmy quoted by Kanzul Haqaiq of Imam Mondadi, p. 7)

“Abu Bakr holds the highest place in this Ummah except that a prophet is raised amongst them.”[(Kanzul Haqaiqi Hadith Khair-el-Khalaiq by Alama Abdur Rauf, Munavi)

The above Hadeeth are perfectly in conjunction with 7:35 of the Holy Qur'an where Allah says that Messengers will come from amongst the children of Adam, and not from some other place.

I close with a Hadeeth of none other than Hazrat Ayesha (rz), who single handedly reported more than 1/2 of the Hadeeth of our Beloved Prophet (sa).

Hazrat Ayesha (ra) stated

“Certainly, do say, he, (The Holy Prophet), is the Seal of all Prophets, but do not say, there is no prophet after him.” (Takmala Majma-ul-Bihar p.15; Vol. 4, p. 85 by Hazrat Imam Sheikh Muhammad Tahir Gujrati)

Another recording of this Hadeeth says,

“You should assert that he is Khatam-al-Nabiyyin but never say there can be no prophet after him.”(Tafsir Durre Mansoor vol.5 p.114, 204 by Imam Jalal-ud-Din Suyuti)

How much more clear could Hazrat Ayesha (rz) be???

Hence, it is very clear as to what the true meaning of Khatamanabiyyeen actually is. Not a single citation I gave is from an Ahmadi Muslim but all from universally accepted Muslim scholars. The proofs are countless but as you can see by the length of this posting, I have already established enough things. May Allah guide all Muslims, insha'allah and always.

love for all, hatred for none

Answer 3

Well, this is the source:

(Zamimah-e-Barahen-e-Ahmadia, Roohany Khazaen, Vol. 21, Part 5, P. 354; Zamimah-e-Barahen-e-Ahmadia, Part 5, P. 183)

Now, if it is out-of-context, please Ahmadiis, explain. If it is not, then Mirza is exaggerating way too much.

033.040 مَا كَانَ مُحَمَّدٌ أَبَا أَحَدٍ مِنْ رِجَالِكُمْ وَلَكِنْ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ وَخَاتَمَ النَّبِيِّينَ وَكَانَ اللَّهُ بِكُلِّ شَيْءٍ عَلِيمًا

033.040 Muhammad is not the father of any of your men, but (he is) the Messenger of Allah, and the Seal of the Prophets: and Allah has full knowledge of all things.

Al-Qur'an, 033.040 (Al-Ahzab [The Clans, the Coalition, the Combined Forces])

And before you (Ahmadiis) say anything, no, it doesn't mean the best of the prophets but it means the SEAL of the prophets.

Answer 4

A Satanic religion has to worship Satan as the figurehead. ...Muslims don't do that, so no.  

Answer 5

Alas....Common sense is not so common.

Answer 6

sad.........

and frustrating......

Answer 7

Deen of Prophet Mohammed PBUH is complete. If Prophetic wahi is supposed to continue after Prophet Mohammed PBUH, this means Islam was incomplete with Prophet Mohammed PBUH.

Finality of Prophet is an milestone in human to mark the reliability of human wisdom under the guidance of Wahi of Prophet Mohammed PBUH.

At this stage Allah SW, ask us to make our own decision from the guidance of Quran and sunnah instead of waiting for Wahi.

And Alhamdulillah Muslim ummah has done much better then one who cliame to have recieved wahi.

Answer 8

That's what he's saying. He just wanted glory imo