Is Rampage overated?

Question

You ever think he got lucky with liddel and overpowered Henderson, or is he really the SH-I T.

Answer 1

okay to the two guys above me apparently you know nothing about Rampage Jackson outside of what you've seen in the UFC, Jackson was a huge force in Pride and he def didn't get a lucky shot against Chuck Liddell that was the 2nd time he beat chuck and his win against Hendo was huge because hendo was a top ranked fighter....Rampage is the real deal

Answer 2

No. He knocked out Chuck in UFC and in Pride. Neither of those fights had anything to do with luck. Plus, he beat Dan Henderson in a tough match. He earned and defended the title fair and square.

Answer 3

He did get a lucky shot on Liddel, but he did beat Henderson straight up.  Not to say he would not have still beaten Chuck but he has proven himself time after time to be legit

Answer 4

thats why he beat Liddell twice and went 5 rounds with a guy who has arguably the strongest chin in MMA.

Answer 5

--Warning my spelling sucks--

LOL

no......heck no....liddel was beat down on the 1st fight and in the 2nd one he (Rampage) just timed it right. There was an opening when the ice man went for the body shoot, even liddel has said that he should have set up the body shot.

look at the people that rampage has won. Lets look at Dan Henderson, Dan won the current UFC heavy wight champ(Nogara) when he was fighting in Pride. He beat the heavier Nogara in an open weight tournament. I mean Rampage over powered that man (Dan Henderson)....yup, its safe to say that Rampage is the sh**.

Answer 6

Rampage punched Chuck with a right-hook after Chuck threw a body shot.

Rampage and his training camp had watched Chuck and knew he may throw body shots whilst standing.

So they made Rampage counter with a right hook, if it happened.

It did. And he was prepared.

That isn't luck.

As for the Henderson fight.  Rampage won 3/5 rounds in that fight in my opinion. And overpowering Henderson, again, isn't luck.