Is Sarah Palin a vile person to trample her daughter's Privacy?

Question

All Sarah Palin had to do to dispel the rumors that Bristol was the mother was to release her own medical records where she gave birth at the hospital in Palmer Alaska.

Instead, she puts her own daughter in the public eye claiming she is pregnant. Why?

Answer 1

If Sarah Palin DIDN'T announce that her daughter is pregnant, you would be accusing her of lying to the public and trying to keep it a secret.

Answer 2

I wouldn't use the word "vile" but I do think it was wrong for her to throw her daughter under the bus like that. Not very motherly.

Answer 3

The idea that the baby boy is Bristol's child is asinine.  Bristol IS pregnant.  You people on here that are dragging that poor girl and her family through the mud are the ones who are being vile.  So sad that this is the worst that you can do to make her look bad--attacking her 17-year-old daughter.

Answer 4

Well said and very aggressive indeed.  

Answer 5

Do you think no one would have noticed her daughter was pregnant in the next few months?

It is better to release the info now instead of waiting.

In fact, she probably released the info not because the media is Gustov 24/7 right now.  If she released the info this weekend, this would be front page news.

If she waited for peopel to figure it out, she would be bashed for trying to cover it up.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;...

And here is someone already accusing her of covering it up.

Answer 6

"Instead, she puts her own daughter in the public eye claiming she is pregnant. Why?"

Her daughter is pregnant, so it isn't a claim. They released this information because news outlets were poised to break the story anyway.