Question:

Is Shahid Afridi???

by Guest62754 | earlier

Is Shahid Afridi a batting all- rounder or a bowling all- rounder....................( at this point of time, what do you think)????

I began Thinking abt it ever since... I heard the commentators saying that he is the top - wicket taker in 2008.....

no offence .intended...

no rude remarks

Tags:

Report

Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

Follow Question

16 ANSWERS

Sort By: Date | Rating

Yes...according to me he is an all-rounder but I also feel that he is better in bowling than he is in batting...
Report (0) (0) | earlier
He came as a batsman & then became a useful bowler as well.He is just a batting all-rounder but the situation has been switched in 2008.But,to say,he is doing his best in both bat & ball & he is just equally good in both.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
bowling al rounder these days
Report (0) (0) | earlier
from a year ago he is transformed from batting all rounder to bowler all rounder...

i just feel that he has lost some of his self confidence in batting.. and as pak team is playing without a genuine spinner he has taken that job..
Report (0) (0) | earlier
He is a fluke cricketer.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Constant... give perfect answer

Hes sucker & loser and cricket worst player ever produce..
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Shahid Afridi is an all-rounder.  Unfortunately he is not a multi-tasker.  He only does one thing well not both.

Right now he is a bowler with the potential to bat well.  We are waiting for the season to change and to see him bat.
Report (0) (0) |   earlier
Geoffrey Boycott described him beautifully-

''He is an exciting player,very talented,has got a great eye and he entertains the audience but i am sorry to say-he has no brain.

You have got to love him for what he is.''

It's hard to tell whether he's a bowling all rounder or a batting all rounder.Right now he is doing better with the ball only.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
I think he started as a batsman but ended up being a better bowler these days so he can be called an all-rounder but his reputation as a batsman far exceeds. I would say he is a batting all-rounder.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
He is a piece of over priced, over hyped c**p. He is only lucky to be surviving in Cricket.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Shahid Afridi initially promised to become one of the greatest strikers of ths ball.When i watched him in inhis early part of his career i felt he will break all records for fastest fifty ,fastest centuury,most runs in an over,most sixes and so on.he did break few of the records i mentioned.but lately since an year or more ,he is failing with the bat and turning out to be wicket taking spinner,due  to his skill ,which he has  learnt by practise.

               IN short he had the talent to become a batting alrounder and he has become a bowling alrounder because of his skill.
Report (0) (0) |   earlier
He seems to have lost it. He gets out so soon.

Did not see any effective bowling either.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
i think he was a very good batsman, but now days he has a hard time putting 20 runs on the score board.

He became more of a bowler than a batsman.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
he is a batsman but a bowler... he can handle both well
Report (0) (0) | earlier
bowling allrounder
Report (0) (0) | earlier
He is a true Pathan and if you put your Q to Afridi?

reply: what ever clicks I'm that B'coz I'm a Pathan.
Report (0) (0) | earlier