Recent posts of the DailyTech article on Hungarian Physicists Miklós Zágoni suggest that AGW is now somehow disproved. What's interesting is that the article references a paper on climate sensitivity by Stephen E. Swartz which it claims agrees with Miklós Zágoni.
Do AGW doubters consider him one of their own? And if so, how would the doubters explain that his paper was published (I thought all dissenters were being unfunded, fired, or blocked from publication)?
Here's the DailyTech article (it calls the greenhouse equation "Totally Wrong"):
http://www.dailytech.com/Researcher+Basic+Greenhouse+Equations+Totally+Wrong/article10973.htm
Referenced paper by Schwartz:
http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/pubs/HeatCapacity.pdf
Schwartz's web-site:
http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/schwartz.html
Another paper by Schwartz:
http://www.nature.com/climate/2007/0707/full/climate.2007.22.html;jsessionid=A7515A3D0B71910FDC8B0DF08203065E
Tags: