Is TNA Sexist to women, or not?

Question

Well Gail Kim is moving to WWE Territory after she claimed TNA didnt give her enough money (100,000 a year which isnt alot) and so is TNA Sexist? Cause the girls only get a little amount of money when they do actually wrestle like the boys...they have hardcore matches, etc, and yet the girls dont get as much money? Why is that? Im not accusing TNA of being Sexist, but In a way, I kind of think they are a bit because why not give the boys the same amount, or atleast like just a little more than the girls and not thousands of pounds more. What do you think?

Answer 1

Well i think its a shame gail's moving. like you said tna knockouts are treated like proper wrestlers where wwe has them do pathetic things like stripping and having a "match" that involves roling on the floor. well they did when i still watched it anyway. As for your question i think no. TNA doesnt have lucrative contracts, it's mentioned on one of their adverts, and was confirmed in interviews. as for the  women being paid less: as good as the women may be compared to WWE it's still the men that headline the show and fill most of the card. this is why they're paid more.

Answer 2

I think its a little hard to say there sexist considering that their ran by a female president Dixie Carter, and she makes the contract offers to the wrestlers. I do think she has decided though that TNA can basically bring in any women's wrestler and make them a instant star, like with what they did with Taylor Wilde, so they're more content on letting higher priced female athletes go. I would have loved to see Gail Kim stay, but I can understand TNA reasoning on why not to offer her a huge contract.